UFOs, DISINFORMATION AND DECEPTION
Simon Harvey-Wilson
|
Many ufologists claim that
the US and UK governments are doing secret research into UFOs while telling
their citizens that they do not exist. If this is true, an understanding
of deception and disinformation techniques may make us less vulnerable to being
fooled. For obvious reasons few governments publish much information about
such techniques. However, deception is frequently used during wars, so by
studying some historical examples we might learn about what is happening
today. Because official disinformation is not the only source of confusion
about UFOs, this article will also discuss other sources
Misleading
information
Deception is to create a misleading impression in your target audience by your actions. It is something that you do to mislead whoever may be observing you, either on a small or large scale. Deception might be directed at the intelligence services of a country that you are at war with, or at your own citizens during peacetime. Most intelligence services see little difference between war and peace time, and unfortunately if you wish to fool the international community you generally have to mislead your own citizens as well. Deception techniques take advantage of the fact that people tend to think that information they had to ferret out is more likely to be true than if it were handed to them on a platter.
|
An example of deception was
revealed in an article in the Sunday Times entitled “Germ war reports
exposed as hoax” (1998). The report tells how released Russian
intelligence files had revealed that in 1952 the North Koreans had deliberately
infected a couple of their own citizens with plague bacilli, and then used
tissue samples from their bodies to convince the world that the Americans were
using germ warfare in the Korean conflict. The United States had
unsuccessfully denied the claims because, as the article says, “Historians had
questioned whether the Koreans and Chinese could have mobilized thousands of
people and faked evidence from scores of doctors, scientists and
officials. But the new papers show they did exactly that.” This
illustrates that some governments will occasionally go to inordinate lengths to mislead.
Disinformation is the
release or leaking of misleading information. I think it was Churchill who
claimed that to keep something secret sometimes one needed “To surround the
truth with a tissue of lies.” By releasing three parts disinformation to
one part truth you can confuse and mislead your target audience. This is
especially important with the UFO phenomenon because, unlike technical secrets,
which can be kept locked up, UFOs appear in public so a completely different
technique is needed to keep them secret.
UFOs were probably first noticed
by Western governments soon after WW II. It is not within the scope of
this article to discuss why the authorities decided to keep them secret, but
once that decision had been made, the best way to do it was obvious. If
they could not make UFOs disappear physically, the solution was to make them
disappear psychologically using perception management or what the military calls
psy-ops (psychological operations). Regardless of what many people were
seeing, they simply decided to define UFOs out of existence, and ridicule the
minority who did claim to see them. I believe that it will eventually be
shown that the UFO cover-up has been the most successful deception campaign in
human history. Ironically, it continues to be so effective that those in
authority may be concerned that the public will refuse to accept the truth even
if concrete evidence is presented to them. In other words, the continued
UFO secrecy may partly be a result of the effectiveness of the earlier
secrecy.
For ease of recall, the categories
used in deception and disinformation involve five verbs beginning
with the letter D. These are: to deny, distract, demean, deceive, and
divide, and it is not hard to think of examples from the history of ufology that
illustrate each of them. These techniques are also frequently used in
politics, especially around election times.
Military
History
Some might challenge the
suggestion that a UFO deception campaign could succeed to the extent that many
ufologists claim. However there have been several historical precedents
that demonstrate how to keep a secret under difficult circumstances.
Michael Lindeman (1999) gives us the example of the US government concealing the
fact that German U-boats were attacking merchant ships off the eastern American
coast during the early years of WW II. “Today few Americans have even the
slightest notion that between
December, 1941 and September, 1942, 292 vessels were torpedoed and hundreds of
merchant seaman lost, most within sight of American beaches”. Wreckage
and bodies that washed up on the shore were impounded by the military,
newspapers were persuaded not to publish stories about it, and “those who were
in the government information loop on this policy were strongly informed that
any breach of security would be considered treason, a crime punishable by
execution”. Not surprisingly the information was not made public.
There is every reason to suspect that a similar policy exists today about
UFOs. The question we need to ask is, when is it going to
end?
There are a few interesting books about deception that I would
recommend. None of them mention UFOs, but they give numerous historical
examples which reveal the imagination, cunning, ruthlessness and audacity that
exponents of deception and disinformation employ. The first is The
Deception Planners: My Secret War (1980) by Dennis Wheatley who was a
famous best-selling author at the outbreak of WW II. He describes how he
became a deception planner in the offices of the British War Cabinet, and
reveals how important such planners were to the war effort. They had
access to all War Cabinet documents and came up with some amazing ideas to
mislead the Germans into sending troops to places where they would do the least
harm. Wheatley clearly sets out the basic guidelines of deception and
illustrates them with examples. It does not take much imagination to see
that those rules could easily be used today in misleading the public and other
governments about what the USA really knows about UFOs. This is an
important point. For example, Stanton Friedman claims that by spreading
convincing cold war rumours that they had mastered UFO technology, the USA might
have deterred other governments from using that same technology to attack them
(Lindeman, 1991, p.26).
A more recent book on deception is The Art of
Military Deception (1997) by Mark Lloyd which gives an historical overview
of the subject from ancient times to the present. Some of his examples
should be of interest to ufologists. During WW II the British set up
propaganda radio stations that, while actually based in England, pretended to be
German stations transmitting from Europe. One of them was specifically
aimed at German U-boat crews. It played the latest German dance music, had
request programs and, “contained dedications for genuine birthdays and
anniversaries gleaned from censored mail passing between German navy prisoners
of war and their families”. Among the music, news stories and highly
detailed reports of bomb damage in Germany was, “slipped subversive information,
morale-sapping innuendo and highly accurate details of the situation on the home
front”. As Lloyd points out, “The effect on U-boat crews, cramped, in
constant danger and thousands of miles from home in the mid-Atlantic, can well
be imagined”. As this example reveals, rather than simply disseminating
false information, a deception source may aim to become a trusted organ of
influence with the purpose of gently guiding their target audience’s views in a
desired direction. To do this they do have to publish some accurate
information. Conspiracy theorists generally assume that the US government
monitors UFO researchers, and may at times wish to divert their attention away
from areas of higher national security significance towards less threatening
topics. One way of doing this would be for them to have secretly funded a
public UFO research organisation or magazine whose covert intention would have
been to centralize the attention of ufologists, keep them distracted and amused
with low level, narrowly focussed ‘scientific’ information, while actually
discussing very little of genuine relevance. In other words, ufologists
perhaps need to pay attention not to what some of today’s UFO magazines are
getting excited about, but rather what it is that they consistently do not
discuss. We also need to realise that there is every chance that a few
leading ufologists are not as dedicated to revealing the truth as they might
appear. We need to distinguish however between what we could call
double-agent ufologists and those who publish misleading information in order to
help sell their books or promote themselves, although pretending to be the
latter would be ideal cover for those who were actually the
former.
Another book that reveals the high level of secrecy and planning
that goes into covert deception activities is Op JB: The Last Great Secret
of the Second World War (1996) by Christopher Creighton, which describes
how British Intelligence secretly smuggled Martin Bormann, Hitler’s private
secretary and executor, out of the ruins of Berlin at the end of the war and
gave him a new identity in England, despite the worldwide manhunt for him.
This was done in exchange for Bormann giving them access to the vast fortune
that the Germans had looted from across Europe. The book also reveals the
absolute ruthlessness used to keep vital information secret. For example,
Creighton claims that, as an undercover British agent, he was required to blow
up a Dutch submarine and all its crew just to prevent them from revealing that
British and US Intelligence had been forewarned of the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbour. This suggests that, as a last resort, people might be killed
(‘terminated with extreme prejudice’) to protect important enough UFO
information, provided that it could be done in a deniable fashion.
A
final recommendation is the book By Way of Deception: The Making &
Unmaking of a Mossad Officer (1990) by Victor Ostrovsky & Claire
Hoy. Once again UFOs are not mentioned, but I believe that anyone that is
serious about ufology needs to read a few such books to learn, firstly just how
little they previously knew about deception, and secondly how imaginative,
ruthless, cynical, well-trained and well-funded the professionals who work in
such fields really are. Unfortunately, and with no disrespect intended,
this means that, in comparison to those managing the UFO cover-up, the average
ufologist is an absolute amateur, and we need to realise that if the authorities
really want to mislead us, there is probably very little we can do about
it.
Examples
Let us look at a few examples of
possible UFO deception.
In his book Above Top Secret (1989) Timothy Good
describes a 1962 incident where some US navy aviators, who were temporarily at
Wright-Patterson Air Force base, entered a hanger looking for sports equipment
to use during their daily fitness workout. Once inside they were stunned
to find a flying saucer-shaped object about four metres wide suspended by two
engine test stands. It was roped off and surrounded by eight guards.
They were promptly told to leave “by an air police sentry with a sub-machine
gun”, and later the senior pilot was reprimanded by his general for breaking
security.
There are several points to be made about this
incident. If the story is true, we could ask why something that is so
secret that it warrants eight guards is kept in an unlocked room. Surely a
better means of security would have been to lock the door and put the guards
outside, thus ensuring that they too did not see what was inside?
Secondly, if one didn’t want people to see the UFO, why rope it off? A
screen would have been far more effective. The standard of security in
this example was so incompetent that whoever was supervising it should have been
promptly court-martialled, unless it was deliberately designed that way.
I do not know if this scenario was actually an example of deception, but
we could ask what purpose the incident might have served if it was? By
‘accidentally’ allowing the pilots to see the craft surrounded with armed
guards, and then accentuating the importance of the situation with a security
reprimand from their general, the whole incident probably became indelibly
etched in their minds. Timothy Good writes that, once outside, the pilots
“had reassured each other that the good old US had developed, or had all along,
flying saucers in service”, and the story then found its way into his
best-selling UFO book for anyone to read. So much for secrecy!
Perhaps the whole episode was carefully designed to reassure US servicemen, and
later the public, that the Pentagon had the UFO situation under control, even if
it didn’t.
Even if various government are involved in UFO deception,
their motives and methods may vary considerably. The apparent abduction of
Franck Fontaine at Cergy-Pontoise on the outskirts of Paris in November 1979 is
a good example. The story is quite complex and is described in several UFO
books.
Franck and a couple of his friends were loading their car
with clothes to sell on their stall in a market about sixty kilometres
away. They had got up before dawn and, while the others brought the
clothes down from their flat, Franck remained in the car to stop it
stalling. They then saw a brilliantly shining UFO and several smaller
lights near the car and, after some confusion, Franck was found to be
missing. The incident was reported to the police and received nation-wide
publicity. One week later Franck reappeared near where he had disappeared
and was amazed to discover that he had been missing for so long.
Most books that mention it leave the case open, however in Jacques
Vallee’s book Revelations: Alien Contact and Human Deception (1991) we
get quite a different story.
Vallee quotes an unnamed official
from French Air Force headquarters who, in November 1980, admitted that the
Cergy-Pontoise abduction had actually been carried out by the French government
in order to observe the reactions and behaviour of the police, media, scientific
investigators and the public. The abduction had been authorized by a
member of the French cabinet and no more than fifteen people knew what had
happened. Franck Fontaine had been grabbed, kept drugged in a secure place
for a week and then returned to where he had been abducted without knowing what
had really happened to him.
Vallee advises that, to eliminate such
official deception in future, abductees should be promptly checked for syringe
marks and given blood and urine tests to check for any knockout drugs. If
Vallee’s report is true, we have the ironic situation of a leading Western
government trying to fool the public into thinking that UFO abductions do exist,
rather that their usual denials. The question that ufologists may need to
ask themselves now, is whether other countries carry out similar fake abductions
to assess public reactions, and if so, how often do they do it?
In 1997,
Sydney engineer and inventor Ted Roach published a small book entitled The
Physics of A Flying Saucer. Roach believes that the propulsion of
UFOs involves discoveries about a unified field theory and the nature of
time. He describes how he had submitted several patent applications to the
Australian Industrial Property Organisation (AIPO) for, “ten inventions for
machines in gravitational, electric and magnetic fields” and claims that, “The
pending patent comprised the physics of flying saucers and other applications
using the Unified Field Theory and six dimensions of space time”.
In reply to his application Roach received a letter from the AIPO which
said that, “due to the nature of the invention and the possible military
interest, the applications have been forwarded to the Department of Defence and
the Australian Safeguards Office for a determination as to whether or not a
publication prohibition order should be placed on the inventions” (p.116).
In the meantime Roach was told not to reveal details of his invention. A
couple of months later his application was cleared by both those authorities,
and a copy of the relevant letter appears in the back of his book.
Most
people would probably have never heard of the Australian Safeguards Office,
however it is well known to many ufologists and ‘free energy’ researchers, that
patent applications in most Western countries can result in a new invention
being confiscated by the authorities and an information blackout being placed on
the subject. This generally only happens if the Safeguards Office believes
that the invention has genuine national security implications, otherwise there
is no point in classifying it.
So what are we to conclude from
Roach’s case? If Roach is telling the truth, can we assume that he was
allowed to proceed with his patent application because someone decided that his
invention wouldn’t work, or was of no relevance? As Roach points out, if
UFOs don’t exist why should anyone be interested in his invention? Are we
to conclude therefore that the Australian Department of Defence and the
Australian Safeguards Office do know that UFOs exist? Or should we be
cautious and suspect that someone behind the scenes saw Roach’s patent
application as an ideal opportunity to muddy the waters a bit more by pretending
to be interested in his inventions, confiscating them for a few months, and then
handing them back knowing that he would probably write about the incident in a
book? I do not know the answer to these questions, but it may be possible
that, if UFOs do exist, the authorities do not want any information about their
propulsion systems to be made public for reasons of national security, and so
are obliged to intercept patent applications such as Roach’s, just in case they
are on the right track.
There are numerous examples where misleading
UFO-related information appears not to have been generated by disinformation
experts. Plenty of magazines and Internet sites publish suspect UFO
information. An example of a misleading UFO-related photograph can be
found in the February 1996 edition of Encounters magazine. The
cover photo, described as a ‘World Exclusive’, showed two jet fighters
accompanying a black triangular craft that is being refuelled in midair.
The photo seems to have been taken towards a bright yellow sunset so that all
four craft are just black silhouettes. The article inside (p.68) claims
that the photo was taken from the ground by a man on holiday in Cornwall, and
reveals that the military has been concealing their connection with such
craft. However, an article in the March/April 1996 edition of UFO
Magazineby Bill Rose claimed that the details in the Encounters
story were completely fictitious, and that the arial refuelling photo is
actually a, “simulation photograph of an Aurora Project aircraft” created by him
to illustrate a sighting of such a craft being refuelled by a KC-135 tanker over
the North Sea in 1989.
Bill Rose’s UFO
Magazine articles are very informative and well-referenced. He appears to
be a mine of information on modern military aircraft and it seems reasonable to
believe his account of the photo’s origins. So here we have a simulated
B&W photo, created with good intentions to illustrate a genuine sighting
report, which ends up being superimposed onto a colour photo of a sunset on the
cover of a rival UFO magazine to illustrate a fictitious conspiracy theory
article about the air force. Ironically, Bill Rose’s article also suggests
that the original triangular craft sighting helps prove that the US or British
air force have secretly developed such a craft. It would be hard to invent
a more confusing scenario that does so little to enhance the credibility of UFO
research.
The UFO literature increasingly contains revelations by people who
claim to have had something to do with UFOs or aliens while working for their
governments. Examples are Bob Lazar (1991);
Nick Pope (1996, 1997); Col. Philip Corso’s
book The Day After Roswell
(1997); Dan Sherman’s Above Black:
Project Preserve Destiny (1997); Michael Wolf’s The Catchers of
Heaven (1996); and Ingo Swann’s
Penetration (1998). Dr Steven Greer who runs the Centre for the Study
of Extraterrestrial Intelligence (www.cseti.org/) claims to have numerous
US government insiders prepared to testify before an official UFO inquiry, if
given permission to break their security oaths. Some insider leaks may be
because these people are no longer worried about breaking their security oaths
because they are old and sick, while others may have been persuaded to take part
in one last disinformation project.
So, how much insider
information should we believe? It is a standard security practice to
compartmentalise highly classified research, meaning that top secret information
is only given to those with a need to know. Christopher Creighton claims
that, of the dozens of people involved in smuggling Martin Bormann out of
Germany, only three or four actually knew who he was. The rest were only
told he was someone important. This suggests that few insiders would be
able to leak the full picture about government UFO research, even if they wanted
to.
An example of an insider not being given the full picture is
Michael Wolf who claims to have been the head of a friendly US team
profiling the various alien groups visiting earth, while another branch of the
military (which he says he wasn’t supposed to know about) was using futuristic
energy-beam weapons to attempt to shoot them down. This duplicitous state
of affairs, simultaneously friendly and hostile, sounds so ridiculous that one
is tempted to believe that it might be true. However, a good
disinformation planner would obviously attempt to create plausible
scenarios.
Some leading ufologists warn us to be extremely suspicious of
insiders offering convincing UFO information. Such a scenario might be a
deception set-up in which the ufologist, if sufficiently naïve, publishes the
information using his or her credibility (‘Trust me, I’m a ufologist!’), only to
have it convincingly refuted some time later. Not only does this sabotage
his or her credibility, and that of ufology in general, but it also helps
persuade others that might in future be leaked genuine inside information, not
to believe it, or to abandon the field all together out of sheer
frustration.
Disinformation or Education?
In this vein we need to ask
ourselves whether the Majestic 12 documents (which supposedly describes a top
secret UFO briefing given to President-elect Eisenhower in 1952) or the ‘Alien
Autopsy’ film are genuine? (A copy of the MJ12 documents can be found
in the appendix of Timothy Good’s Above Top Secret.) Could a
sophisticated disinformation game be being played here? Those in charge of
the UFO cover-up, assuming that someone is in charge of it, probably have
contingency plans ready in case, for example, a UFO landed in the middle the
Olympic Games, or a football grand final. They would hopefully also know
that one day they must reveal at least part of the truth about UFOs, so they
might be preparing us for such a revelation by feeding us genuine UFO
information in a semi-fictitious but entertaining form. It has even been
suggested that popular films such as Men In Black are part of that
educational program.
When one considers the
Pentagon’s increasingly unlikely Roswell explanations, parachute test-dummies
indeed!, we could be excused for suspecting that they are implying that the
Roswell story does have some validity, but that it is still too early for them
to admit it out loud. Let us be aware
therefore that any future US president’s ‘full and frank admission’ about UFOs
has every probability of being only a self-serving part of the whole
picture.
Following on from the ‘Are we being educated?’ question, what
are we to make of the US space agency NASA and a majority of its astronauts
acting as if UFOs do not exist? How could NASA not know about UFOs?
Is their behaviour just a public deception? Although a civilian agency,
NASA is still subject to national security restrictions, regardless of how much
its employees might dislike it.
In his book Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific
Analysis (1995), NASA rocket scientist Paul Hill points out that, while he
worked there, NASA’s policy was that, regardless of the evidence, UFOs do not
exist. He was not happy with this situation, but could do nothing about
it. Unlike the military, scientists tend to see scientific discoveries as
transcending national boundaries. So we could have some sympathy for those
NASA scientists who might dearly wish to make what they know about UFOs public,
but are perhaps reluctantly obliged either to keep silent or make misleading
statements about them. However, even if not actively engaged in spreading
disinformation, such silence does contribute to misleading the
public.
That brings us to the various Search for Extraterrestrial
Intelligence (SETI) projects, which are now funded largely by private
enterprise. How is it possible for millions of dollars and hours of
valuable radio telescope time, which includes Australia’s Parkes radio
telescope, to be spent listening for alien radio messages while some of those
very aliens appear to be flying over our heads. An article in Flying
Saucer Review by Jorge Martin reports that numerous UFOs, including some
very large ones, have been seen near the radio astronomy observatory at Arecibo
in Puerto Rico, which is involved in SETI.
There are not many researchers
employed by SETI (computers do most of the listening) so is it possible that
they too have been misinformed about UFOs? In an end-of-the-millennium
article in Scientific American (Dec, 1999) entitled “Is There Life
Elsewhere in the Universe?” SETI scientists Jill Tarter and Christopher Chyba
write that, “Despite tabloid reports of aliens and artefacts everywhere,
scientific exploration so far has revealed no good evidence for any such
things”. It is hard to know whether such comments are the product of
ignorance or deception. It is clearly untrue that UFO information comes
only from tabloids, and Tarter and Chyba neglect to mention which ‘scientific
exploration’ it was that ‘revealed no good evidence’ for UFOs. Had they
been more honest, they might have admitted that there was plenty of good
scientific evidence for the existence of UFOs, but that they were either
unwilling or not permitted to mention it.
Could SETI have a covert
purpose apart from listening for aliens? As Terence McKenna writes,
“To search expectantly for a radio signal from an extraterrestrial source is
probably as culture-bound a presumption as to search the galaxy for a good
Italian restaurant.” Even if we did pick up an alien message from a planet
that was, let’s say, twenty-five light-years away, what are we then going to
do? It would be a very tedious conversation if we answered it, and then
had to wait another fifty years (twenty-five years there and twenty-five back)
for their reply.
While keeping a few computer engineers, software
designers and astronomers in gainful employment, perhaps SETI actually serves
the more important purpose of introducing the public to the idea that there are
almost certainly aliens out there somewhere. Rather than listening for
aliens, SETI’s main function may be to send a non-threatening message about
aliens to the public here on Earth, as a prelude to informing them that those
aliens are already here. Most SETI scientists might be unaware of this
covert motive, which would make the whole project a masterpiece of
deception.
Many ufologists had hoped that (FOI Freedom of Information)
legislation would provide access to numerous revealing UFO related
documents. However this has not generally proved to be the case. For
a start, all FOI legislation has exemption clauses preventing the release of
documents that might jeopardise national security, and the bureaucrats are not
silly enough to give the game away by saying “Sorry we cannot release those
documents on the grounds of national security”. Instead they adopt more
frustrating tactics. They may take ages to answer your letter, or deny
having the documents, or ask exorbitant fees for copying them (Fawcett &
Greenwood, 1984). Some of the documents that have been released suggest
that the US and British governments do take UFOs seriously. Nevertheless
FOI documents provide an ideal deception opportunity, and so we should be
cautious in interpreting them. An Internet site that contains a large
number of UFO-related US government documents is The Black Vault (www.blackvault.com/).
It has been
claimed that when the US government started to research UFOs in the late forties
they set in place a security system the likes of which had never been seen
before. That system has no doubt been redesigned numerous times since
then, but would still appear to be working effectively. Col. Corso (1997)
claims that some UFO debris was handed over to trusted defence contractors to
reverse-engineer. Even if this is not true, it is still possible that a
significant proportion of UFO research has been conducted by private enterprise
where the paperwork is protected by commercial secrecy and beyond the reach of
FOI legislation. In Ingo Swann’s book Penetration (1998) he claims to have
worked briefly for a US organisation which was so secretive that it left no
paper-trail at all. It would obviously be impossible to obtain documents
from an organisation that does not have
any.
Religion
Another category of
deception is the sensitive subject of self-deception. There are some
people with strongly held religious views who are convinced that UFOs and
abductions are the work of the devil, designed to fool humanity into straying
from the path of righteousness. Such people seldom consider that it may be
they who are misled, and their dogmatism does not compensate for their lack of
concrete evidence, or disregard for the basic principles of science. It is
bad enough that our governments appear to be deceiving us about UFOs without
various religious groups adding more confusion to the subject.
As
an example, consider the following information that was e-mailed from Alex
Ruxton to about fifty UFO ufologists and research groups worldwide in January
2000. Ruxton claims that there are “200 million reptilian devils that are
now in a state of hibernation underneath the pyramids of Egypt and Mexico! They
are scheduled to resurface very soon. They already have their battle plans
prepared. The majority of their troops will be sent to invade the leading
industrialized nations. We do not have much time left…. If you think that
I am kidding then please find the hole in my story.”
Ruxton’s
evidence comes largely from the Book of Revelation, and his website describes
his theory in detail. Unfortunately, there are so many holes in his story
that most people would probably not even bother replying. However, to be
fair, we should acknowledge that much of the information supposedly provided by
aliens to abductees over the last few decades is fairly garbled. Are
aliens also trying to mislead us, or are our technical and cultural differences
so great that we would be incapable of understanding them whatever they told
us?
Thankfully, some students of religion are more rational.
Timothy Paul Prevett claims to have completed an honours thesis in 1998 at
Regents Theological College on the ‘Demonic Eschatological Hypothesis’ (DEH)
which claims that “ETs are a demonic deception heralding the approach of the
return of Christ”. After reviewing the available literature, Prevett
concludes that UFOs, “should be seriously and calmly investigated by the full
power of science” because, “the DEH is unsatisfying and theologically
questionable. There are too many possibilities, and little ground for
dogmatism”.
To justify the belief that we are being deceived about UFOs,
it helps to believe that a well-funded, well-informed, top secret UFO research
project does exist. However, the assumption that an ubiquitous,
all-powerful, unknowable, superior authority, has the disturbing matter of UFOs
under control could itself be seen as a type of reassuring religious
belief. We therefore need to be careful that we are not deceiving
ourselves into believing that ‘the authorities’ know more than we do about UFOs,
because deep down we are frightened that they really know very little.
Could they be using UFO disinformation to reassure us while they desperately try
to work out what to do? After all, a military mentality is probably the
least appropriate mind-set to research a phenomenon that appears to be a
combination of nuts-and-bolts, paranormal and spiritual ingredients. Or
have we also been mislead about that?
To illustrate that UFO
disinformation does occasionally have its lighter side, a short article in the
MUFON UFO Journal (‘509th’, 1999) describes how that magazine had been
sent a shoulder patch supposedly now used by the 509th Bomb
Wing whose members were formerly stationed at Roswell (and recovered the
July 1947 crash debris), but who now fly B-2 stealth planes from Whiteman Air
Force Base. The circular patch displays the Latin phrase ‘Gustatus Similis
Pullus’, which means ‘tastes like chicken’? and shows an alien’s head above a
delta-winged craft. So, do the 509th really eat aliens for
breakfast? The MUFON UFO Journal editor contacted Whiteman AFB
and was told that, although ‘pretty funny’, the hoax patch did not belong to the
509th.
|
This article has only been able to address a small proportion of the
questionable information about UFOs available to the public, but it is
nevertheless obvious that we have to be careful about what we choose to believe,
because there are those out there who seem determined to mislead us for one
reason or another, while others may actually be trying to educate us.
Unfortunately, the situation is likely to get even more confusing as some new
air force planes appear to be modelled on genuine UFOs, and rumours exist that
the US government may one day stage a fake alien attack in order perhaps to
justify the subsequent militarisation of space (Hayakawa). Helmut
Lammer even believes that US military involvement in some abductions may
be related to mind control research on their own citizens. It is claimed
that the second most popular type of Internet sites are UFO related ones.
Unfortunately, this means that an ever increasing number of people are available
to be misinformed. Let us hope that one day soon someone in authority,
human or alien, has the decency and courage to begin telling us what is really
going on about UFOs.
References
CSETI.
Available at: http://www.cseti.org/
Corso, Philip
J. (1997) The Day After Roswell. New York: Pocket
Books.
Evans, Hilary. (1984) Cergy-Pontoise. In
Brookesmith, Peter (Ed.). The Alien World (pp. 87-95). London:
Macdonald & Co.
Creighton, C. (1996) Op. JB. The Last Great
Secret of the Second World War. London: Simon & Schuster.
509th
Bomb Group Files. (1999, November) MUFON UFO Journal, No.379,
p.11.
Friedman, Stanton. (1991) The Case for UFOs as Alien
Spacecraft & the Government Cover-up.
In Lindeman, Michael (Ed.).
UFOs & the Alien Presence. Santa Barbara, California: The 2020
Group.
Fawcett, Lawrence & Greenwood Barry J. (1984) Clear
Intent: The Government Cover-up of the UFO Experience. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice Hall.
Germ war reports exposed as hoax. (1998, November
15) Sunday Times [WA], p.43.
Good, Timothy. (1989) Above
Top Secret: The Worldwide UFO Cover-up. London: Grafton Books.
Gotcha!
Exclusive Report Captured With Camera. (1996, February) Encounters,
Issue 4, 68-69.
Hayakawa, N: http://www.eaglehost.com/groomwatch/
Lammer, Helmut. (1999, Nov-Dec) Milabs: Military
abductions of alien abductees. UFO Magazine, 14-16.
Lazar, Bob.
(1991) Alien Technology in Government Hands. In Lindeman, Michael
(Ed.), UFOs & the Alien Presence. Santa Barbara, California: The 2020
Group.
Lindeman, Michael. (1999, Nov/Dec) Challenging UFO
Secrecy. UFO Magazine, 66-69.
Lloyd, Mark. (1997) The Art
of Military Deception. London: Leo Cooper.
Martin, Jorge. (1999,
Winter) Are UFOs watching the radio-astronomical observatory at
Arecibo? Flying Saucer Review, Vol.44/4, 23-25.
McKenna, Terence.
(1991) The Archaic Revival. San Francisco: Harper
SanFrancisco
Ostrovsky, Victor & Hoy, Claire. (1990) By Way
of Deception: The Making & Unmaking of a Mossad Officer. New York: St.
Martin’s Press.
Pope, Nick. (1996) Open Skies, Closed
Minds. London: Simon & Schuster
Pope, Nick. (1997) The
Uninvited. London: Simon & Schuster.
Prevett, Timothy P.
(1998) An evaluation of belief in extraterrestrial life. BA (Hons)
thesis, Regents Theological College.
Roach, Ted. (1997) The
Physics of A Flying Saucer. Sydney: Roach Industries.
Rose, Bill.
(1996, March/April) The Hidden Aurora. UFO Magazine, 4-7.
Ruxton,
Alex. Available at:
http://msnhomepages.talkcity.com/AquariusAve/ruxtonal/
Sherman, Dan. (1997) Above Black: Project Preserve
Destiny – Insider Account of Alien Contact & Government Cover-up. Tualatin:
One Team Publishing.
Swann, Ingo. (1998) Penetration: The
Question of Extraterrestrial & Human Telepathy. Rapid City, South
Dakota: Ingo Swann Books.
The Black Vault: http://www.blackvault.com/
Vallee,
Jacques. (1991) Revelation: Alien Contact and Human Deception.
New York: Ballantine Books.
Wheatley, Dennis. (1980) The
Deception Planners: My Secret War. London: Hutchinson.
Wolf,
Michael. (1996) The Catchers of Heaven – A Trilogy.
Pittsburgh: Dorrance Publications.
Dennis Stacy
Lightning flashed over Corona, New Mexico, and thunder rattled the thin windowpanes of the small shack where ranch foreman Mac Brazel slept. Brazel was used to summer thunderstorms, but he was suddenly brought wide awake by a loud explosion that set the dishes in the kitchen sink dancing. Sonofabitch, he thought to himself before sinking back to sleep, the sheep will be scattered halfway between hell and high water come dawn. In
the morning, Brazel rode out on horseback, accompanied by seven-year-old
Timothy Proctor, to survey the damaged. Accoring to published accounts,
Brazel and young Proctor stumbled across something unearthly--a field of
tattered debris two to three hundred yards wide stretching some
three-quarters of a mile in length. No rocket scientist, Brazel still
realized he had something strange on his hands--so strange that he decided
to haul several pieces of it into Roswell, some 75 miles distant, a day or
two later. For
all its lightness, the debris in Brazel's pickup bed seemed remarkably
durable. Sheriff George Wilcox reportedly took one look at it and called
the military Army Air Field, then home to the world's only atomic-bomb
wing. Two officers from the base eventually arrived and agreed to
accompany Barzel back to the debris field. As
a consequence of their investigation, a press release unique in the
history of the American military appeared on the front page of the
Roswell Daily Record for July 8, 1947. Authored by
public-information officer Lt. Walter Haut and approved by base commander
Col. William Blanchard, it admitted that the many rumors regarding UFOs
"became a reality yesterday when the intelligence officer of the 509th
Bomb Group of the Eighth Air Force, Roswell Army Air Field, was fortunate
enough to gain possession of a disc through the cooperation of one of the
local ranchers and the sheriff's office of Chaves
County." Haut's
noon press release circled the planet, reprinted in papers as far abroad
as Germany and England, where it was picked up by the prestigious
London Times. UFOs were real! Media calls pour in to the Roswell
Daily Record and the local radio station, which has first broken the
news, demanding additional details. Four
hours later and some 600 miles to the east in Forth Worth, Texas, Brig.
Gen. Roger Ramey, commander of the Eighth Air Force, held a press
conference to answer reporters' questions. Spread on the general's office
floor were lumps of a blackened, rubberlike material and crumpled pieces
of what looked like a flimsy tinfoil kite. Ramey posed for pictures,
kneeling on his carpet with the material, as did Maj. Jesse Mercel, flown
in from Roswell for the occasion. Alas, allowed the general, the Roswell
incident was a simple case of mistaken identity; in reality, the so-called
recovered flying disc was nothing more than a weather balloon with an
attached radar reflector. "Unfortunately,
the media bought the Air Force cover-up hook, line, and sinker," asserts
Staton Friedman, a nuclear physicist and coauthor with aviation writer Don
Berliner of Crash at Corona, one of three books written about
Roswell. "The weather-balloon story went in the next morning's paper, the
phone calls dropped off dramatically, and any chance of an immediate
follow-up was effectively squelched." Ramey's
impromptu press conference masks the beginning of what Friedman refers to
as a "'Cosmic Watergate,' the ongoing cover-up of the government's
knowledge about extraterrestrial UFOs and their terrestrial activities."
By contrast, says Friedman, the original Watergate snafu and cover-up
pales in significance. In fact, if Friedman and his cohorts within the UFO
community are correct, military involvement in the recovery of a crashed
flying saucer would rank as the most well-kept and explosive secret in
world history. Of
course, not all students of the subject see it that way. "You have to put
Roswell in a certain context," cautions Curtis Peebles, an aerospace
historian whose treatment of UFOs as an evolving belief system in Watch
the Skies! was just published by the Smithsonian Institute. "And the
relevant context is the hole of government and its relationship to the
governed. Americans have always been suspicious, if not actively
contemptuous, of their government. On the other hand, forget what the
government says and look at what it does. Is there any evidence in the
historical record that the Air Force or government behaved as if it
actually owned a flying saucer presumably thousands of years in advance of
anything on either the Soviet or U.S. side? If there is, I didn't find
it." Regardless
of its ultimate reality, however, Roswell symbolizes the difficulties and
frustrations Friedman and fellow UFOlogists have encountered in prying
loose what the government does or does not know about UFOs. Memories fade,
documents get lost or misplaced, witnesses die, and others refuse to speak
up, either out of fear of ridicule or, according to Friedman, because of
secrecy oaths. Despite a trail that lay cold for more than 30 years, UFOlogists still consider Roswell one
of the most convincing UFO cases on record. In 1978, for example,
Friedman personally interviewed Maj. Jesse Marcel shortly before his
death. "He still didn't know what the material was," says Friedman,
"except that it was like nothing he had ever seen before and certainly
wasn't from any weather balloon." According to what Marcel reportedly told
Friedman, in fact, th featherlight material couldn't be dented by a
sledgehammer or burned by a blowtorch. Yet
getting the Air Force itself to say anything about Roswell in particular
or UFOs in general can be an exercise in futility. Officials are either
bureaucratically vague or maddeningly abrupt. Maj. David Thurston, a
Pentagon spokesperson for the Air Force Office of Public Affairs, could
only refer inquiries to the Air Force Historical Research Center in
Montgomery, Alabama where unit histories are kept on microfilm for public
review. But a spokesperson there said they had no "invesstigative
material" and suggested checking the National Archives for files from Project Blue
Book, the Air Force's public UFO investigative agency from the late
1940s until closure in December of 1969. Indeed,
the dismissive nature with which U.S. officials treated Blue Book research
seemed to indicate they were unimpressed; on that point, believers and
skeptics alike agree. But according to Friedman and colleagues, that
demeanor, and Blue Book itself, was a ruse. Instead, far from the eyes of
Blue Book patsies, in top-secret meetings of upper-echelon intelligence
officers from military and civilian agencies alike, UFOs--including real
crashed saucers and the mangled bodies of aliens--were the subject of
endless study and debate. What's more, claims Friedman, proof of this UFO
reality can be found in the classified files of government
vaults. With
all this documentation, Friedman might have had a field day.
Unfortunately, researchers had no mechanism for forcing classified
documents to the surface until 1966, when Congress passed the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). The FOIA was later amended in the last year of the
Nixon administration (1974) to include the Privacy Act. Now individuals
could view their own files, and some UFOlogists--Friedman included--were
surprised to find that their personal UFO activities had resulted in
government dossiers. But
that as it may, UFOlogists saw the FOIA as a means to end, and beginning
in the 1970s, their requests and lawsuits started pouring in. Attorneys
for the Connecticut-based Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) and other
UFO activities eventually unleashed a flood tide of previously classified
UFO documents. In
many cases, notes Barry Greenwood, director of research for CAUS and
coauthor with Lawrence Fawcett of The Government UFO Cover-up, most
agencies at first denied they had any such documents in their files. "A
case in point is the CIA," says Greenwood, "which assured us that its
interest and involvement in UFOs ended in 1953. After a lengthy lawsuit,
the CIA ultimately released more than a thousand pages of documents. To
date, we've acquired more than ten thousand documents pertaining to UFOs,
the overwhelming majority of which were from the CIA , FBI, Air Force, and
various other military agencies. It's safe to say there are probably that
many more we haven't seen." As
might be expected, the UFO paper trail is a mixed bag. Many of the
documents released are simple sighting reports logged well after the
demise of Blue Book. Others are more tantalizing. A document released by
the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) revealed that several
sensitive military bases scattered from Maine to Montana were temporarily
put on alert status following a series of sightings in October and
November of 1975. An Air Force Office of Special Intelligence document
reported a landed light seen near Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque,
New Mexico, on the night of August 8, 1980. Another
warm and still-smoking gun, according to greenwood, is the so-called
Bolender memo, named after its author, Brig. Gen. C. H. Bolender, then Air
Force deputy director of development. Dated October 20, 1969, it expressly
states that "reports of unidentified flying objects which could affect
national security ... are not part of the Blue Book system," Says
Greenwood, "I take that to mean that Blue Book was little more than an
exercise in public relations. The really significant reports went
somewhere else. Where did they go? That's what we would like to
know." Of
course there are objections to such a literal interpretation. "As I
understand the context in which it was written, says Philip Klass, a
former senior editor with Aviation Week and Space
Technology and author of UFOs: The Public Deceived, "the
Bolender memo tried to address the problem of what would happen with UFO
reports of any sort following the closure of Project Blue Book. Bolender
was simply saying that other channels for such reports, be they incoming
Soviet missiles or whatever, already existed." Greenwood
counters that the original memo speaks for itself, adding that "the
interesting thing is that sixteen referenced as missing from Air Force
files." Missing
file are one problem. Files known to exist but kept under wraps, notes
Greenwood, are another. To make his point, he cites a case involving the
ultra secret National Security Agency, or NSA, an acronym often assumed by
insiders to mean "Never Say Anything." Using cross references found in CIA
and other intelligence-agency papers, CAUS attorneys filed for the release
of all NSA documents pertaining to the UFO phenomenon. After initial
denials, the NSA admitted to the existence of some 160 such documents but
resisted their release on the grounds of national
security. Federal
District Judge Gerhard Gessell upheld the NSA's request for suppression
following a review (judge's chambers only) of the agency's classified
21-page in Camera petition. "Two years later," Greenwood says, "we finally
got a copy of the NSA In Camera affidavit. Of 582 lines, 412 or
approximately 75 percent, were completely blacked out. The government
can't have it both ways. Either UFOs affect national security or they
don't." The
NSA's blockage of the CAUS suit only highlights the shortcomings of the
Freedom of Information Act, according to Friedman. (See the sidebar
"Freedom Fighters Handbook," beginning on page 36.) "The American public
operates under the illusion that the FOIA is some sort of magical key that
will unlock all of the government's secret vaults," he says, "that all you
have to do is ask. They also seem to think everything is in one one big
computer file somewhere deep in the bowels of the Pentagon, when nothing
could be farther from the truth. Secrecy thrives on
compartmentalization." In
the recent years, UFOlogist have found an unsual ally in the person of
Steven Aftergood, an electrical engineer who directs the Projection on
Government and Secrecy of the Washington, DC-based Federation of American
Scientists, where most members wouldn't ordinarily give UFOs the time of
day. "Our problem," says Aftergood, "is with the government secrecy on a
principle, because it widens the gap between citizens and government,
making it that much more difficult to participate in the democratic
process. It's also antithetical to peer review and cross-fertilization,
two natural processes conductive to the growth of both science and
technology. Bureaucratic secrecy is also prohibitively
expensive." Aftergood
cities some daunting statistic in his favor. Despite campaign promises by
a succession of Democratic and Republician presidential administrations to
make government files more publicly assessible, more than 300 million
documents compiled prior to 1960 in the National Archives alone still
await declassification. Aftergood also points to a 1990 Department of
Defense study, which estimated the cost of protecting industrial--not
military--secrets at almost $14 billion a year. "That's a budget about the
size of NASA's," he says, adding that "the numbers were ludicrous enough
during the Cold War, but now that the Cold War is supposedly over, they're
even more ludicrous." Could
the Air Force and other government agencies have their own hidden agenda
for maintaining the reputed Cosmic Watergate? Yes, according to some
pundits who say UFOs may be our own advanced super-top-secret aerial
platforms, not extraterrestrial vehicles from on high. Something of the
sort could be occurring at the supersecret Groom Lake test facility in
Nevada, part of the immense Nellis Air Force Base gunnery range north of
Las Vegas. Aviation buffs believe the Groom Lake runway, one of the
world's longest, could be home in the much-rumored Aurora, reputed to be a
hypersonic Mach-8 spy plane and a replacement for the recently retired
SR-71 Blackbird. In
fact, the Air Force routinely denies the existence of Aurora. And with
Blue Book a closed chapter, it no longer has to hold press conferences to
answer reporters' questions about UFOs. From the government's perspective,
the current confusion between terrestrial technology and extraterrestial
UFOs could be a marriage of both coincidence and convenience. The Air
Force doesn't seem to be taking chances. On September 30 of last year, it
initiated procedures to seized another 3,900 acres adjoining Groom Lake,
effectively sealing of two public viewing sites of a base it refused to
admit exists. By
perpetuating such disinformation, if that is, in fact, what's happening,
the Air Force might be using a page torn from the Soviet Union's Cold War
playbook. James Oberg, a senior space engineer and author of Red Star
in Orbit, a critical analysis of the Soviet space program, has long
argued that Soviet officials remained publicly mum about widely reported
Russian UFOs in the 1970s and 1980s because each reports masked military
operations conducted at the super secret Plesetsk Cosmodrome. "Could a
similar scenario occur in this country? It's conceivable," concedes Oberg.
"On the other hand, should our own government take an interest in UFO
reports, especially those that may reflect missile or space technology
from around the world? Sure. I'd be dismayed if we didn't. But does it
follow that alien-acquired technology recovered at Roswell is driving our
own space technology program? I don't see any outstanding evidence for
it." Friedman's
counterargument is not so much a technological as a political one.
"Governments and nations demand allegiance in order to survive," he says.
"They don't want us thinking in global terms, as a citizen of a planet as
opposed to a particular political entity, because that would threaten
their very existence. The impact on our collective social, economic, and
religious structures of admitting that we have been contacted by another
intelligent life form would be enormous if not literally catastrophic to
the political powers that be." Whatever its reason for holding large numbers of documents and an array of information close to the vest, there's no doubt that the U.S. government has been less than forthcoming on the topic of UFOs. Historically, the government's public attitude toward UFOs has run the gamut of human emotions, at times confused and dismissive, at others deliberately covert and coy. On one hand, it claims to have recovered a flying disc; on the other, a weather balloon. One night UFOs constitute a threat to the national security; the next they are merely part of a public hysteria based on religious feelings, fear of technology, mass hypnosis, or whatever the prevailing psychology of the era will bear. To sort through the layers of confusion spawned by the government's stance and to reveal informational chasms, whatever their cause, Omni is launching a series of six continuing articles. In the following months, we will take the long view, scanning through history to examine UFOs under wraps in the decades following Roswell.
Shortly before midnight of July
19, 1952, air-traffic controllers at Washington National Airport picked up
a group of unidentified flying objects on their radar screens. Over
the next three and a half hours, the targets would disappear and reappear
on their scopes. They were visually corroborated by incoming flight crews.
At 3:00 in the morning, the Air Defense Command dispatched two F-94 jet
interceptors, which failed to make contact with the
targets. The
following weekend, the same scenario virtually repeated itself. Unknown
targets were picked up on radar and verified both by incoming pilots and
ground observers. This time, the hurriedly jets did manage to make visual
contact and establish a brief radar lock-on, and the general public joined
in the hoopla as well. According to The UFO Controversy in
America, by Temple University historian David Jacobs, "So many calls
came into the Pentagon alone that its telephone circuits were completely
tied up with UFO inquiries for the next few days." In several major
newspapers, the 1952 UFO flap even bumped the Democratic National
Convention off the front-page headlines. The
so-called "Washington Wave" also resulted in at least two events that have
been debated ever since. On July 29, in an attempt to quell public
concern, the military held its largest press conference since the end of
WWII. Press conference heads Maj. Gen. John Samford, director of Air Force
Intelligence, and Maj. Gen. Roger Ramey, chief of the Air Defense Command,
denied that any interceptors had been scrambled and attributed the radar
returns to temperature inversions. In
addition, the Washington sightings led directly to the CIA-sponsored
Robertson Panel, so named after its chairman Dr. Harold P. Robertson,
director of the Weapons Systems Evaluation Group for the secretary of
defense. The panel's basic mandate was outlined in a document later
retrieved under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA). In
that crucial document, a 1952 memorandum to the National Security Council
(NSC), CIA director Walter Bedell Smith wrote that "a broader, coordinated
effort should be initiated to develop a firm scientific understanding of
the several phenomena which are apparently involved in these reports, and
to assure ourselves that [they] will not hamper our present efforts in the
Cold War or confuse our early warning system in case of an
attack." In
line with this mandate, the panel that finally convened in Washington, DC,
in mind January of 1953 consisted of some of the best scientific minds of
the day. Members included a future Nobel Prize laureate in physics, Luis
Alvarez, formerly of Berkeley; physicist Samuel Goudsmit of the Brookhaven
National Laboratories; and astronomer Thornton Page of Johns Hopkins
University, later with NASA. Yet
for all of its scientific expertise, the Panel's major recommendations
fell mainly in the domain of public policy. After a review of the
evidence, the Panel concluded that while UFOs themselves did not
necessarily "constitute a direct threat to the national security . . . the
continued emphasis on the reporting of these phenomena does [threaten] the
orderly functioning of the protective organs of the body
politic." Panel
members recommended that "national-security agencies take steps
immediately to strip the UFO phenomenon of its special status and
eliminate the aura of mystery it has acquired." Perhaps a public-education
program with the dual goals of "training and debunking" could be
implemented? In this context, the Panel suggested that the mass media
might be brought to bear on the problem, up to and including Walt Disney
Productions! More
interestingly, the Panel also recommended that pro--UFO grassroots
organizations be actively monitored "because of their potentially great
influence on mass thinking if widespread sightings should occur."
Mentioned by name were two organizations that had arisen in the wake of
the Washington Wave: Civilian Saucer Intelligence of Los Angeles and the
Aerial Phenomena Research Organization of Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, both
now defunct. Is
there evidence that such surveillance was conducted or that the Robertson
Panel recommendations influenced government policies? "The paper trail is
sketchy at best," says Dale Goudie, a Seattle advertising agent and
information director for the Computerized UFO Network, or CUFON, an
electronic bulletin board specializing in UFO documents retrieved under
the FOIA. "What we know is that some agencies tend to keep some old UFO
files while throwing out or mysteriously losing others. For example, we
know the FBI kept a file on George Adamski, a famous UFO 'contactee' of
the Fifties, perhaps because they thought he was a communist, and that the
CIA had communicated with Maj. Donald Keyhoe, later one of the directors
of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial
Phenomena. "When
it comes to their own programs, however, the agencies are a bit more
absent-minded." An example, says Goudie, is Project Aquarius. "The
National Security Agency [NSA] admitted in a letter to Senator John Glenn
that apparently there is or was an Air Force Project Aquarius that dealt
with UFOs," Goudie states. "Their own Project Aquarius, they said, did
not, but they refused to say what it did deal with. They did admit it was
classified top secret and that the release of any documents would damage
the national security. The Air Force denies the existence of their own
Project Aquarius, and the NSA now says it was mistaken. They ought to get
their stories straight." "It's
almost impossible to confirm that any individual action was directly
dictated by the Robertson Panel," agrees physicist and UFOlogist Station
Friedman, co-author of Crash at Corona, "but was the subject defused at
every available opportunity per its recommendations? You
bet!" Friedman
points specifically to a press release issued on October 25, 1955, by the
Department of Defense, chaired by secretary of the Air Force Donald
Quarles. The occasion was the release of Special Report 14, issued by
Project Blue Book, the Air Force agency publicly charged with
investigating UFOs. Quarles said there was no reason to believe that any
UFO had ever overflown the United States and that the 3 percent of
unknowns reported the previous year could probably be identified with more
information. As
Friedman sees it, however, Special Report 14 was the best UFO study ever
conducted. Interpreting the report for Omni, Friedman says it showed that
"over 20 percent of all UFO sightings investigated between 1947 and 1952
were unknowns, and the better the quality of the sighting, the more likely
it was to be an unknown. The press release failed to mention any of the
240 charts and tables in the original study," adds Friedman, "nor did it
point out that the work had been done by the highly respected Battelle
Memorial Institute under contract to the Department of Air Force. It's a
classic case," Friedman says, "of the government having two hands and the
left one not knowing what the right one is up to." Whatever
the truth about UFOs, however, the government tried mightily to conceal
information suggesting mysterious origins afoot. For a population already
shaky over nuclear arsenals, cold war, and communists under every bush,
officials may have reckoned that the notion of visitors from beyond, even
imaginary ones, might just have been too much to
bear. The
Sixties were marked by upheaval: street riots outside the Democratic
National Convention in Chicago, demonstrations against the war in Vietnam,
"free love," and psychedelic drugs. And according to pundits, a "Big
Brother" government intent on suppressing the winds of change had extended
its reach beyond the merely social or political to the realm of UFOs. The
result of this saucer suppression? Angry congressional hearings and the
closure of Project Blue Book, the Air Force agency responsible for
investigating UFOs. The
Sixties' "Saucergate" was triggered on March 20, 1966, when a glowing,
football-shaped UFO was reported hovering above a swampy area near the
women's dormitory of a small college in Hillsdale, Michigan. Witnesses
included 87 female students and the local civil-defense director. The
following night in Dexter, 63 miles away, another UFO was spotted by five
people, including two police officers. The
Michigan sightings provoked a national outcry; in short, the public wanted
an explanation. Addressing the largest media gathering in the history of
the Detroit Free Press Club, Project Blue Book spokesman J. Allen Hynek,
an astronomer with Ohio State University, finally ventured an opinion. He
said the sightings might be due to "swamp gas"--methane gas from rotting
vegetation that had somehow spontaneously ignited. The explanation didn't
wash, and both Hynek and the Air Force found themselves the brunt of
immediate and almost universal ridicule. Newspapers had a field day as
cartoonists, columnists, and editorial writers nationwide lampooned the
Air Force suggestion. In
a letter to the House Armed Services Committee, then-Michigan congressman
and House Republican minority leader (and later president) Gerald R. Ford
called for congressional hearings on the subject, arguing that "the
American public deserves a better explanation than that thus far given by
the Air Force." The subcommittee subsequently held its hearing on April 5,
1966, but only three individuals, all with Air Force connections, were
invited to testify: Hynek; then-Blue Book chief Hector Quintanilla; and
Harold D. Brown, secretary of the Air Force. Brown told the committee,
chaired by L. Mendel Rivers, that they had no evidence of an
extraterrestrial origin of UFOs, nor was there any indication that UFOs
constituted a threat to national security. Under
scrutiny, however, the Air Force eventually agreed to an outside review of
Blue Book's files. Toward that end, the Air Force awarded $500,000 to the
University of Colorado at Boulder. The major-domo of this extensive review
was physicist Edward U. Condon, former director of the National Bureau of
Standards. His second in command was the assistant dean of the graduate
school, Robert Low. Initially,
critics of the government's UFO policy were happy to see the matter out of
Air Force hands. But it didn't take long for their faith in the Condon
effort to fade. If the Air Force had tried to gloss over the UFO issue,
said retired Marine major Donald E.
Keyhoe, director of the civilian National Investigation Committee on
Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), the Condon
Commission was even worse. The
day after his appointment, for instance, Condon was quoted in the
Denver Rocky Mountain News. He saw "no evidence," he said, for
"advanced life on other planets." Moreover, he explained, the study would
give the public a "better understanding of ordinary phenomena, which, if
recognized at once, would reduce the number of UFO
reports." Low,
Condon's chief administrator, seems to have prejudged the reality of UFOs,
too. In a telling memo written to University administrators, Low noted
that "the trick would be, I think, to describe the project so that to the
public it would appear a totally objective study but to the scientific
community would present the image of a group of non-believers trying their
best to be objective but having an almost zero expectation of finding a
saucer." Condon
soon fired the two senior staffers he blamed for leaking the memo to the
press. Two weeks later, Mary Lou Armstrong, his own administrative
assistant resigned, citing low morale within the project as a whole.
"Low's attitude from the beginning," she wrote, "has been one of
negativism. [He] showed little interest in keeping current on sightings,
either by reading or talking with those who did." At one point, Low left
for a month, ostensibly to represent the Condon Committee at the
International Astronomical Union in Prague. Staff members suggested he use
the opportunity to meet with veteran UFO researchers in England and
France. Instead, Low went to Loch Ness, claiming that sea monsters and
UFOs might share some similarities since neither existed. Even so, there
is no record that he filed any written notes on his
investigations. The
Condon Report was published in August of 1968 as the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying
Objects. In all, 30 of the 91 cases analyzed remained unidentified.
Examining the famous McMinnville, Oregon, UFO photos, for example, project
investigators opined that this was "one of the few UFO reports in which
all factors investigated, geometric, psychological, and physical, appear
to be consistent with the assertion that an extraordinary flying object,
silvery, metallic, disc shaped, flew within sight of two witnesses." Of a
radar/visual UFO sighting that occurred over Lakenheath, England, in
August of 1965, the study concluded that "the probability that at least
one genuine UFO was involved appeared to be fairly
high." Yet
these suggestions that an unidentified phenomenon might indeed be afoot
were buried in a bulky 1,500-page report. More readily accessible to the
media was Condon's conclusion, published at the beginning of the study
rather than at the end, as was standard scientific procedure. Essentially,
Condon concluded, "further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be
justified in the expectation that science will be advanced
thereby." The
Air Force seized the opportunity to withdraw from the minefield of UFOs,
and on December 17, 1969, called a press conference to announce the
closing of Project Blue Book. Citing the Condon report, acting secretary
of the Air Force, Robert C. Seamans, Jr., told reporters that Blue Book's
continuation could no longer "be justified on grounds of national security
or in the interest of science." Critics
contend that Blue Book never mounted a thorough scientific investigation
of the UFO phenomenon to begin with, and that during its 22-year
involvement with the issue, it had functioned as little more than a
public-relations program. The charge, it turns out, was made by Hynek
himself. In his last interview, granted this reporter shortly before his
death from a brain tumor, Hynek avowed that while the Air Force always
said it was interested in the study of UFOs, officials regularly "turned
handsprings to keep a good case from getting to the attention of the
media. Any case they solved," Hynek added, "they had no trouble talking
about. It was really sad." As
the Sixties came to a close, the Air Force finally got what it wanted: It
officially washed its hands of UFOs. Condon continued to deny the subject
was "shrouded in secrecy." Overall, he said, the Air Force had done a
commendable job. Hynek
agreed, though for reasons of his own. "The Air Force regarded UFOs as an
intelligence matter, and it became increasingly more and more embarrassing
to them," he said. "After all, we paid good tax dollars to have the Air
Force guard our skies, and it would have been bad public relations for
them to say, 'Yes, there's something up there, but we're helpless.' They
just couldn't do that, so they took the very human action of protecting
their own interests." Todd
Zechel knows how David felt the day he marched out to take on Goliath.
Early in 1978, in otherwise out-of-the way Prairie due Sac, Wisconsin,
Zechel help found Citizens Against UFO Secrecy, or CAUS. The group's
mandate: to take on teh behemoth of the U.S. government, which had kept
thousands of documents relevant to UFO researchers under lock and key for
years. In
the past, getting to those documents had been virtually impossible. For
the most part, they were buried within a paper labyrinth of agencies
within agencies, each employing its own unique form of "bureauspeak" and
filing. What was an "unidentified flying object" in one agency might be an
"incident report" or "air space violation" in another. The reports might
be in the form of a carbon copy, microfilm, or rapidly degrading thermal
fax paper, barely legible in the original. Other files were lost or
routinely destroyed on a regular basis. Still,
one had to start somewhere, and CAUS was determined to track down and make
public as many of the existing documents as it could. In its quest for
truth, the new group would put out a newsletter called Just Cause, and,
with the help of UFO researcher Brad Sparks and attorney Peter Gersten,
tread legal waters no UFO group had entered before. "We were full of
fire," Zechel now recalls. "We had served the government notice; we
weren't going to take their stonewalling anymore, and if necessary, we
would haul them into court." The
euphoria was not misplaced. As the Seventies unfurled, most UFOlogists
felt that all they needed in the battle against the governmental Goliath
was one good slingshot. And now that slingshot, in the form of the newly
enacted Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, was
here. Signed
into law in 1966 by a Democratic Congress under President Lyndon Johnson,
FOIA (affectionately called "foya" was created so the public could access
all but the most high y classified government records. Nine categories of
information were originally exempted from scrutiny, beginning with those
affecting national security and foreign policy and then trickling down
into fairly mundane materials like maps. UF0s, of course, weren't
mentioned at;all. Then,
in the mid Seventies, the Nixon administration gave FOIA more muscle
still. Time limits were imposed on agencies receiving FOIA requests.
Affordable fees for the search and reproduction o' requested documents
were established, and courts were empowered to decide whether or not
specific documents fell within the act's guidelines. In
the real world outside the halls of Congress, however, the soldiers for
CAUS found land mines strewn across the battlefield. The first CAUS
celebre, Zechel states, occurred before the Wisconsin group was officially
formed. It was 1977, and Zechel, Sparks, and Gersten made their stab at
wielding the FOIA through the auspices of the nowdefunct Ground Saucer
Watch, a UFO group based in Phoenix. In 1975, it turns out, the Phoenix
group's director, Bill Spaulding, had written the CIA complaining it had
withheld a vast quantity of information on UFOS. "It
wasn't an official FOIA request as such," Zechel says, but more like an
accusatory letter. Surprisingly, the CIA responded." Specifically,
Spaulding had referenced the case of one Ralph Mayher. a marine
photographer who claimed to have filmed a UFO over Miami Bay in July of
1952. Mayher went on to become a celebrated news cameraman with ABC news
in Los Angeles. Not surprisingly, under the circumstances, he also signed
on as consultant to one of the more prominent UFO organizations of the
day-the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, or
NICAP. Only years later did Mayher learn that, unbeknownst to him, his
original film had been turned over to the CIA for
analysis. Looking
into the matter, the CIA's response to Spaulding was expected: Its
interest in UFOS was virtually nonexistent, the Agency declared, and had
been ever since 1953, when a panel of scientists met in Washington to
declare the phenomenon a public-relations problem, nothing more. But much
to Spaulding's surprise, the spy agency also released two documents
relating to the Mayher case. "The Agency had blacked out about 70 percent
of the documents," Zechel states, "and also referred to three other
related documents still in their possession." Zechel retained Gersten, who
in 1977 filed a suit seeking full release of all five documents. The case
wound up in federal district court as GSW vs. the CIA under the
jurisdiction of Judge John Pratt. After protracted legal maneuverings,
lawyers for both sides finally met with representatives of the attorney
general's office in Washington in July of 1978. "At that meeting,"
according to Zechel, "I had threatened to have the CIA prosecuted for
making false replies under the FOIA. Ultimately, the Agency agreed to
search all of its files for UFO records and to stipulate which ones it
would release and which it wouldn't. As the FOIA was structured at the
time, the CIA was also obligated to account for any deletions on an
item-by-item basis' " As
Zechel recalls, the CIA missed its original 90-day deadline by 88 days.
"Then they dumped a stack of documents on our desk about two to three feet
thick, heavily blacked out, and with none of the deletions accounted for,"
Zechel states. "We now had 30 days to try to identify and contest the
deletions, which was humanly impossible." Instead, Gersten filed a motion
claiming the CIA stood in contempt of court and clearly had not acted in
good faith. The motion was filed after GSW's own 30-day response deadline
had expired, however, and Judge Pratt summarily dismissed the suit. "We
were one day late," Zechel recalls, and that effectively ended the suit."
But when all was said and done, the CIA decided to release some 900 pages
of Ufo-related documents. Indeed, like the CIA, many agencies decided to
release documents even when courts did not force their hands.
A
request for UFO files from the FBI, for instance, netted almost 2,000
pages; By scrutinizing documents obtained from the FBI and CIA, moreover,
CAUS researchers were able to identify witnesses. They could also pinpoint
relevant incidents likely to be described in documents on file with a host
of other government agencies. Ultimately, CAUS would be responsible for
the release of between 7,000 and 8,000 Ufo-related documents from a who's
who of official entities, including the Air Force, Coast Guard, Navy,
Defense Intelligence Agency, North American Aerospace Defense Command,
Federal Aviation Administration, and others. Among the major tidbits
revealed were a series of sightings reported from October through November
1975 by the northern tier of Air Force bases from Montana to Maine;
several of these sightings involved personnel stationed at Minuteman
silos. CAUS also uncovered a September 1976 file on an Imperial Iranian
Air Force jet that reportedly locked its radar onto a bright UFO only to
have its electronic weapons system fail. CAUS's most celebrated suit,
however, was the one it launched against the super secret National
Security Agency (NSA) in December 1979. The case was not fully resolved
until March 1982 when the Supreme Court refused to hear Gersten's appeal.
Although the agency admitted to having approximately 57 documents
pertaining to UFOs in its files, it successfully refused to release them,
citing national-security concerns. Despite
the progress, Zechel can't help wishing that CAUS had been able to do
more. "I felt we could inflame the public and marshal tremendous popular
support," Zechel says, "but we never got beyond four or five hundred
members. We were constantly hampered by a serious lack of funds and the
usual personality conflicts." As
for Gersten, he expresses disappointment that not every known document was
turned over to CAUS, especially those from the CIA and NSA, but concedes
that "they were probably withheld for legitimate reasons. I suspect they
were protecting their own intelligence sources and technology." Gersten
performed all of his work for CAUS pro bono, but estimates that his fees
would have come to nearly $70,000. "And that's in 1970 dollars," he
says. As
the decade of the 1970s came to a close, Zechel left CAUS and has since
founded the Associated Investigators Group. CAUS, meanwhile, continues
under different officers and still puts out its publication, Just CAUSE on
a regular basis. "What's
changed most is the FOIA itself," says Barry Greenwood, the newsletter's
editor and current CAUS director of research. "The act was essentially
gutted by Executive Order number 12356, signed by President Ronald Reagan.
Among other changes wrought by Reagan's general secrecy order," according
to Greenwood, "is the fact that agencies are no longer required to respond
within a reasonable period of time. Searches, when they do them at all
now, routinely take between six months and two years. The fees have gone
up, too," Greenwood complains. "One agency cited us the enormous search
fee of $250,000. It's very discouraging." Pennsylvania
researcher Robert Todd was also involved with CAUS early on, but his
experiences have left him disillusioned with both David and Goliath. "The
UFO community won't be satisfied until the government admits it's behind a
vast cover-up," says Todd. Is there a lot of material still being
withheld? Without a doubt. But does that prove the government is engaged
in a massive conspiracy, or that it's merely a massive bureaucracy? I
can't state this strongly enough: I don't believe there's a cover-up at
all." A
spokesperson with the CIA's Freedom of information office in Washington,
DC, refused a telephone request to talk to someone regarding the agency's
Freedom of Information Act policy, explaining that all such inquiries
would first have to be submitted in writing to John H. Wright, information
and privacy coordinator. Following agency guidelines, Omni has submitted a
written request for explanation of CIA policy as well as UFO documents,
past and present. The request is still pending but remained unanswered at
press time. Results of our inquiry will have to wait for a future edition
of the magazine. As
far as the UFO community is concerned, the work of CAUS, Zechelstyle,
remains undone. These days, says Todd, "getting any kind of document out
of the government is a lengthy, time-consuming process. First, they
consider the FOIA an annoyance; after all, they're understaffed and
saddled with budget constraints. Second, the nature of any government is
to control the flow of information." |
Immediately after the Oklahoma City bombing in the spring of 1995, mainstream Americans suddenly became aware of a radical political subculture in their midst. With the arrest of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols and the media coverage of their lives, attitudes, and associations, the public was abruptly introduced to the previously insular world of militias, antigovernment shortwave-radio broadcasts, and racist literature. A racist novel (written by Andrew Macdonald, also known as William Pierce), The Turner Diaries—unobtainable through conventional bookstores—became an object of intense interest once it became known that McVeigh had read and recommended it, and it was revealed that the novel contained an episode strikingly similar to the federal building bombing. An avalanche of television, magazine, and newspaper stories uncovered the existence of conspiracy believers obsessed with black helicopters and armed against what they believed to be an imminent invasion by forces of the New World Order.1 More
than any other single event, the Oklahoma City bombing brought New World
Order ideas to the public's attention. But New World Order ideas had begun
to seep into broader segments of the American consciousness even earlier.
Pat Robertson had published his book The New World Order in 1991.
Robertson's version of the conspiracy (what might be termed "New World
Order lite") is mild compared to that of such militia figures as Mark
Koernke; nevertheless, his book is filled with ominous warnings: "The New
Age religions, the beliefs of the Illuminati, and Illuminated Freemasonry
all seem to move along parallel tracks with world communism and world
finance. Their appeals vary somewhat, but essentially they are striving
for the same very frightening vision." Robertson claims that an elite
network of the superrich, operating through secret societies, is on the
verge of taking undisputed control of the world. At the same time,
references to the New World Order were also beginning to appear in the
speeches of another conspicuous public figure, Pat Buchanan, who linked
such concerns with threats to America's economic independence.2
Thus
in the early 1990s New World Order conspiracy theories ceased to be
beliefs that circulated only in an obscure political underground and began
to penetrate some channels of mainstream discourse. In fact, however, the
most dramatic New World Order penetration came not from Robertson,
Buchanan, or coverage of the Oklahoma City bombers. Rather, it occurred
earlier, in a segment of American culture that straddles the divide
between "mainstream" and "deviant" and encompasses millions of people—the
UFO community. Those who are interested in UFOs, believe in them, or claim
to have been contacted or abducted by them form a subculture knitted
together by lecture circuits, Web sites, magazines, and conventions.
Depending on how it is defined, it is also a subculture of immense size.
UFOs
and Public Opinion The
number of Americans who actually participate in the UFO subculture—by
buying books, magazines, and videotapes; attending conferences; visiting
Web sites; and engaging in similar activities—cannot be precisely
estimated. But survey data make clear that those who do participate
represent merely a fraction of a vast number of people interested in the
subject. Whether they are open-minded or simply credulous, it remains the
case that millions of Americans view UFOs with considerably less
skepticism than do the government and the academy. Within
a few months of the first modern claim of a flying saucer sighting in June
1947, polls showed that 90 percent of the population had heard of them. By
1966, that figure had risen to 96 percent, and, more important, 46 percent
of all Americans believed UFOs actually existed. More than a decade
later—in 1978—30 percent of college graduates believed they existed. At
that time, the number of Americans who believed UFOs were real reached its
highest level, 57 percent. The number fell to 47 percent in 1990 but was
still at 48 percent in a 1996 Gallup poll, nearly half a century after the
first sighting.3 The Yankelovich polling organization interviewed 1,546 adults in mid-January 2000 for Life magazine. Forty-three percent of respondents believed UFOs were real as opposed to "the product of people's imaginations," and 30 percent thought intelligent beings from other planets had visited the earth. Six percent had seen a UFO, and 13 percent knew someone who had. Seven percent claimed to have "had an encounter with beings from another planet" or knew someone who had. 4 A 1997 Time-CNN poll (presumably commissioned in connection with the fiftieth anniversary of the Roswell, New Mexico, UFO "crash" indicated that 17 percent of Americans believed in alien abduction. An even stranger result had appeared in a 1992 Roper survey, which suggested that 2 percent of Americans (roughly 3.7 million) believed they themselves had been abducted. While the Roper result is almost certainly inflated, a number even half as large would be extraordinary. 5 Two aspects of these figures are particularly striking. First, they have remained astonishingly stable over a fifty-year period. What might have been an early Cold War fad clearly came to occupy a semi-permanent niche in the American psyche. Second, the level of belief was not only relatively stable; it was extraordinarily high, regardless of when the survey was taken or by which polling organization. Even if one compensates for problems of sampling or the wording of questions, tens of millions of Americans accept the reality of UFOs. In a survey of 765 members of the UFO community, Brenda Denzler found her respondents to be anything but "fringe." They were predominantly white, male, middle-class college graduates, with incomes just slightly below the national median.6 At
the same time, attitudes about UFOs contain the seeds of conspiracist
thinking, for public attitudes are clearly at variance with the official
position that there is no credible evidence that UFOs exist. Indeed, in
the 1996 Gallup survey when subjects were asked, "In your opinion, does
the U.S. government know more about UFOs than they are telling us?" 71
percent answered yes. In the Yankelovich poll in 2000, 49 percent believed
that the government was withholding information about UFOs.7
Thus
an extremely large number of people hold beliefs that contradict official
government positions and believe that government concealment explains the
discrepancy. Belief in a government cover-up runs deep in the ufology
community, especially among those who are professional or full-time UFO
writers or investigators. Because government investigations have failed to
satisfy believers, the existence of a cover-up appears logical to them.
Even so, early ufologists did not generally advance a broader political
agenda. While steadfastly maintaining that military and intelligence
organizations were concealing the truth from the public, they did not
extend that suspicion to embrace any larger ideology of conspiracy. In
short, ufology's early political program did not extend beyond a general
desire to see revealed what was believed to be concealed.
But
by the late 1980s, elements of the UFO community began to link their
interest in explaining flying saucers with a larger political vision.
Receptivity to New World Order ideas in some UFO circles was facilitated
by two legends peculiar to the ufology milieu: the "men in black" story
and the tale of underground bases. The
legend of the Men in
Black originated in the early and mid 1950s and quickly became a
staple of UFO folklore. According to this legend, people whose experiences
or research brought them too close to the truth were apt to be stalked,
harassed, or even killed by small groups of men—usually two or three—in
dark suits who did not identify themselves. Their ambiguous appearance has
led to a number of explanations: to some, they are secret government
operatives; to others, representatives of a conspiracy that controls the
government; to still others, they are aliens whose appearance is close
enough to that of humans to allow them to pass. In any case, their
appearance and demeanor make them a potent symbol of mysterious but
pervasive evil. 8 The
underground-bases legend is part of a larger complex of beliefs about
secret installations where (depending on the version) captured or crashed
alien craft or aliens themselves may be kept. In the most dramatic
versions, the aliens actually control parts of the installation, either by
themselves or in concert with secret government agencies. The most famous
base is Area
51, also known as Groom Lake and Dreamland, north of Las Vegas,
Nevada; but the most elaborate tales involve labyrinthine subterranean
caverns, tunnels, and chambers such as those allegedly near the town of
Dulce, New Mexico. These stories have led to belief in a hidden world
variously inhabited by alien beings or evil human forces, in which
conspirators can both conceal their enterprises and seek safety when
disasters overtake the earth's surface.9 UFOs and the New World Order Gradually,
parts of the UFO community began to adopt elements of the conspiracy
theories described in the previous two chapters, and by the end of the
1980s virtually all of the radical right's ideas about the New World Order
had found their way into UFO literature. Ufology's adoption of the New
World Order was by no means universal, but those who have found it
attractive have been able to create a version of New World Order theory
with some distinct political advantages. The
most immediate advantage for New World Order ideas of being placed in a
UFO context has been a reduction in stigma. Although UFO ideas have often
been the target of ridicule, the enormous size of the UFO-accepting public
has made it impossible to stigmatize UFO beliefs so completely that they
are banned from public discussion. Far from it—UFO ideas have ready access
to such avenues of distribution as cable television, mainstream
bookstores, and magazine publishers. They fall into the realm of
stigmatized knowledge, in that they are rejected by science, universities,
and government, but the level of stigmatization has not been so great as
to exclude them from popular culture. By
contrast, the views of the radical right have been so excluded, through an
unstated yet powerful pattern of self-censorship on the part of the
mainstream. This voluntary silence has denied access to beliefs deemed
racist, bigoted, completely unfounded, or likely to justify or promote
violence. Tales of secret Illuminati conspiracies, imminent UN invasions,
and Jewish, Masonic, or Jesuit plots, for example, have been informally
banned from media, classrooms, and other mechanisms of knowledge
distribution. Unlike beliefs about flying saucers, considered eccentric
but socially harmless, many conspiracy ideas deemed both false and
dangerous have been banished from the mainstream discourse.
The
linkage of New World Order ideas with UFOs gave the former a bridge to the
territory of semirespectable beliefs. Ufology became, as it were, the
vehicle for the New World Order to reach audiences otherwise unavailable
to it. To be sure, New World Order ideas occasionally reached mass
audiences, as the cases of Pat Robertson and Pat Buchanan have shown. In
both cases, however, the conspiracies were presented in highly diluted
versions; and in Robertson's case, even his weak version produced
significant political problems. The
story of the New World Order—UFO connection is a story of ideas moving in
two directions, not one. In the initial movement, New World Order beliefs
became entwined with UFO beliefs. A second migration followed in the
1990s, in which New World Order ideas with their new UFO add-ons returned
to the right-wing milieu in which they had first developed. In that
milieu, the combination led to the development of two diametrically
opposed syntheses. In one, exemplified by British writer and lecturer
David Icke (discussed at length in chapter 6), the human conspirators
feared by the radical right are actually doing the bidding of malevolent
extraterrestrial forces whose ultimate aim is control of the earth. In the
other, epitomized by the views of Milton William Cooper at the end of his
life, there are in fact no aliens at all. The appearance of an alien
assault on the earth is being manufactured by human conspirators to
provide a pretext for the assumption of global dictatorial powers.
The
first movement, when New World Order ideas left the hermetic world of the
extreme right and began to seep into ufology, is the more significant of
the two. As the preceding discussion suggests, there were factors in
ufology that made this penetration seem logical, but it was not
inevitable. It does not seem to have been consciously undertaken by
conspiracists or done for opportunistic reasons, even though in the end it
provided a large new audience. Rather, it began in a disorganized,
piecemeal fashion, and it provides a case study in the migration of
deviant ideas. UFO Conspiracism: The First Phase The
development of New World Order conspiracy theories within ufology can best
be understood as the product of two separate phases. The first—from
roughly 1975 to 1980—introduced increasingly conspiratorial motifs into
UFO speculation, but without any discernible links to the conspiracy ideas
that were prevalent on the extreme right. There seem to have been two
separate conspiracist tracks that developed independently of each other.
This lack of connection between the two is all the more striking because
the late 1970s were a period of substantial right-wing activity, with the
growth of such movements as Christian Identity and the Posse Comitatus.
The Posse was an antigovernment movement made up of local paramilitary
groups active in the West and Midwest during the 1970s and 1980s. They
believed the only legitimate governmental authority to be the county
sheriff's posse, in the form of the armed adult males of a community.
There is no evidence that ufologists were aware of, interested in, or
sympathetic to those tendencies. During
this initial phase, some important themes emerged in the UFO literature
that were eventually integrated into more elaborate conspiratorial
structures. One of these concerned small devices allegedly implanted in
the bodies of UFO abductees. Although such stories were not numerous, they
implied the existence of a powerful technology for monitoring and
controlling victims' behavior. Thomas Bullard's detailed analysis of 270
abduction stories (most of them dating between the 1940s and 1980) reveals
only thirteen cases of reported implants—barely 5 percent. These were
almost uniformly distributed among the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. Despite
their small numbers, however, the implant stories contained two points of
potential connection with the independently developed New World Order
conspiracy theories described earlier. First, they offered apparent
confirmation of the mark of the beast associated with the Antichrist.
Second, they also appeared to validate the mind-control fears of more
secular conspiracists.10 About the same time, in 1976, a Toronto-based neo-Nazi and Holocaust denier, Ernst Zündel, published the first of several reports linking flying saucers with the Nazis. In the strangest version of this tale, Nazis, not aliens, had invented flying saucers and, with the regime's defeat, had fled to subterranean bases in Antarctica with their invention. The suggestion that flying saucers had been under development by the Third Reich and were spirited out of Germany appears to have emerged first among German nationalists in the 1950s. It was quickly assimilated into legends of Hitler's supposed escape to South America or the Antarctic. By 1960, comparable tales were circulating in English, though their full elaboration had to await the efforts of Zündel and other neo-Nazis a decade and a half later. While this scenario begged the question of how so technologically advanced a government could manage to lose the war, it was a story that turned out to have a long life for two reasons. First, it introduced the idea that a secret group of human beings might in some conspiratorial fashion develop such devices. Second, it established a link between UFOs and the much older occultic tradition of an "inner world" beneath the earth.11 The
year 1976 was also the year that some ufologists began to link UFOs with
cattle mutilations. Stories of mutilated cattle, mostly in western states,
began to appear in the late 1960s and became numerous and the subject of
national media coverage by the mid 1970s. Although they were occasionally
connected to reports of UFO sightings, a number of alternative
explanations were offered, including satanic rituals, "hippies," and
natural enemies. The carcasses were often missing portions of soft tissue,
and some reports claimed that cuts were made with a precision inconsistent
with animal predators.12 In
1979, Linda Moulton Howe, a Denver filmmaker, began work on a documentary
that alleged a mutilation-UFO connection. The film, A Strange
Harvest, was broadcast in 1980. She later stated that "I am convinced
that one or more alien intelligences are affecting this planet. I would
like to know who they are, what they want and why the government is
silent." Howe and others, influenced by her film and subsequent
publications, began to speculate that aliens mutilated cattle in order to
secure body parts or biological substances they needed for their own
survival, and that the U.S. government was complicit in these efforts. The
idea that aliens were engaged in some obscure effort to "harvest" or
otherwise retrieve biological substances from the earth has turned out to
be a fertile subject for speculation, which eventually came to include
such suggestions as the breeding of alien-human hybrids. The ease with
which stories of cattle mutilation were assimilated into the UFO
literature was a paradigmatic case of fusing disparate forms of
stigmatized knowledge. If cattle mutilations and alien spaceships could be
connected, why not other stigmatized knowledge claims as well?13
Speculations
about an alien harvest soon coalesced with aspects of the abduction
stories. Nearly half of the abduction tales examined by Bullard featured
invasive, often painful physical examinations. A number of accounts
included examinations of reproductive organs, and about half a dozen
individuals reported sexual intercourse with alien beings. Out of this
body of narratives came suggestions that aliens were seeking either to
harvest substances from human bodies or to create a race of alien-human
hybrids. Because the "other" here was alien in every sense, it was easy to
blur the distinction between procedures performed on cattle and those
performed on human beings; in the more sinister interpretation, it
suggested that human beings were being treated like breeding stock,
presumably to compensate for some biological defect in the aliens.14
In
1977, UFO speculation took a different turn with the broadcast by Anglia
TV in Great Britain of the strange purported documentary Alternative
3. Alternative 3 claimed to expose a secret plan, approved at
the highest levels of the U.S. and Soviet governments, to launch a program
of space colonization that would allow a select few to flee the earth
before environmental calamities made the planet uninhabitable. The show
strongly implied that a secret joint base already existed on the far side
of the moon, that another existed or would shortly be established on Mars,
and that the Martian surface, contrary to general belief, was hospitable
to human life.15 Alternative
3
was clearly a hoax—and not only because it was broadcast on April Fool's
Day. The interviews with supposed scientists, astronauts, and others were
far too dramatically polished to have been spontaneous, and in any case
the program's closing credits named the actors who took the roles of
interviewees and correspondents. Though artfully produced, the show's
counterfeit documentary style could scarcely have been expected to fool
many. As an Anglia TV spokesman put it, "we felt viewers would be fairly
sophisticated about it." They apparently were not; television and
newspaper switchboards were swamped after the broadcast. Anglia found it
prudent to sell off the book rights. The 1978 book version, by Leslie
Watkins, continued the pretense of factuality. It also reached countries,
including the United States, where the broadcast had not been aired.
Whenever the book was unavailable, believers attributed its absence to the
conspirators' attempts at suppression. This type of quasi-paranoid fear is
a particularly strong tendency in the United States. And the story lent
itself to conspiracist interpretations—who were the elite the secret space
program was intended to save? Even those willing to acknowledge that
Alternative 3 was trumped up insisted that its core argument might very
well be true—another instance of the demolition of the fact-fiction
boundary .16 Alternative
3
does not mention UFOs or aliens. Its role in the growth of conspiracy
theory lay in a later permutation, according to which UFOs and the threat
of an alien invasion of the earth are believed to have been invented by
the shadowy elite in order to gather sufficient power and resources to
complete the space-colonization enterprise. When the scenario of
Alternative 3 came to be enfolded within ufological conspiracism,
it suggested that UFO conspiracy theories could go in two different
directions. The first insisted on the reality of a threat from outer
space, with human conspirators involved as the aliens' lackeys or
collaborators. The other direction, following the Alternative 3
suggestion, claimed that UFOs from outer space were a deception concocted
by the conspirators for their own malevolent purposes, in order to deflect
attention from the real evil. UFO Conspiracism: The Second Phase The
first phase in the growth of UFO conspiracy theories extended through the
late 1970s. It was characterized by a fragmentation of themes, whether of
abductees' implants, cattle mutilations, or Nazi bases. The only product
of the period that purported to offer an integral conspiracy theory was
the fictional Alternative 3 broadcast, which had not mentioned UFOs at
all. By contrast, the second phase, which began in the mid 1980s, was
marked both by the broader scope of conspiracy allegations and by the
convergence of UFO plots with the better-developed conspiracism of the
extreme right. The
first full published statement of such a theory appeared in 1986, in
George C. Andrews's book Extra-Terrestrials among Us. Although
Andrews's conspiracy theory appears in bits and pieces strewn throughout
the volume, it can be reconstructed roughly as follows. A race of evil
extraterrestrials is using a "privileged elite caste" of humans to
manipulate and control the masses. As far as the United States is
concerned, the principal mechanism for political control is the CIA, a
"government within the government," implementing a form of "corporate
fascism." Andrews accuses the CIA of having assassinated John F. Kennedy,
and he cites William Pabst's pamphlet claiming that a network of
concentration camps is being readied for dissenters. He fears that martial
law is about to be declared, bringing an end to American democracy. The
explicit use of Pabst's work, warnings about the Rex 84, and repeated
claims that the Constitution is in imminent danger make Andrews's
political views almost indistinguishable from those associated with
militias. Only his placement of extraterrestrials at the pinnacle of the
conspiracies identifies him as a ufologist.17 The
publication of Extra-Terrestrials among Us marked the beginning of
a feverish period of UFO conspiracism, from 1986 to 1989. Much of the
literature of this period was based on the concept of a secret governing
apparatus, unknown and unaccountable, not unlike Andrews's notion of the
CIA as a "government within the government." The idea of a hidden
government received its most significant boost in 1987 with the
publication of the so-called MJ-12 papers. MJ-12—sometimes referred to as Magestic-12 or Majic-12—purports to be a document prepared for President Dwight Eisenhower, to which was attached a memo from President Harry Truman to his defence secretary, James Forrestal. Though made public in 1987, MJ-12 had a history that went back to 1984. According
to those involved, on December 11, 1984, Jaime Shandera, a film producer,
received a package anonymously sent from Albuquerque, New Mexico,
containing an undeveloped roll of film. He and UFO writer William Moore
developed the film, which they said contained images of the MJ-12
documents. Although the documents were not made public until June 1987,
when they were revealed at a UFO conference in Washington, D.C., UFO
publications referred to them as early as 1985. Facsimile copies were
reproduced in the British edition (and later the American edition) of
Timothy Good's Above Top Secret, and have appeared elsewhere many
times since.18 The
MJ-12 documents take the form of a briefing paper for the newly elected
president, informing him of the existence of a supersecret group of the
same name, allegedly established during the Truman administration, that
consists of a dozen high military and scientific figures. The documents
describe crashes of UFOs and the recovery of their occupants' bodies,
which established them as of indisputably extraterrestrial origin.
MJ-12
immediately polarized the UFO community into believers and skeptics. Among
the skeptics was Jacques Vallee, who compared the incident to the
activities of "Deep Throat" during the Watergate scandal. He suggested
that the documents' sender was more likely interested in disinformation
than in whistle-blowing, and implied that the documents were forged. Even
more dismissive was Philip J. Klass, a longtime debunker of UFO hoaxes,
who argued that the format and language of the documents pointed to
forgery.19 In
the years since the MJ-12 papers became widely known, they have taken on a
life of their own. Additional, related documents periodically appear, some
as recently as 1998. Just as with the Kennedy assassination, MJ-12 has
generated a cottage industry of commentators, authenticators, and critics.
More broadly, MJ-12 laid the foundation for elaborate conspiracy theories
by suggesting that UFOs were of extraterrestrial origin, that the federal
government was aware of them as early as the late 1940s, and that a secret
bureaucracy had been created to study and control the situation. These
claims allowed some ufologists to shift from observation of flying saucers
to attempts to unravel alleged government machinations. The proliferation
of MJ-12 documents and theories not only identified the enemy as a segment
of the government, but—inasmuch as this "secret government" was supposed
to have hidden all relevant information—allowed great latitude in what
might be "revealed." It mattered little whether publicly available
evidence confirmed a claim; its author could always respond, "The
government knows it, but won't tell you."20 The
first such revelation occurred on December 29, 1987, a few months after
the release of the MJ-12 papers. It took the form of a statement by John
Lear, estranged son of inventor William Lear. Building upon the original
MJ-12 documents, Lear constructs a far more elaborate edifice of intrigue
and dissimulation. The Lear statement narrates the purported history of
the relationship between the MJ-12 group and the extraterrestrials from
1947 to 1987. Although Lear cites few sources and offers no documentation,
his statement, like many conspiracy narratives, is striking in its
specificity. The "horrible truth" to which MJ-12 was allegedly privy was so frightening that it drove at least one member—Secretary of Defence Forrestal—to suicide, his death disguised as the result of mental illness. According to Lear, the U.S. government began to hold meetings with the aliens on April 30, 1964, and by 1971 had negotiated a "deal." Its terms called for transfer of the aliens' technology to the government, in exchange for which the government would acquiesce in cattle mutilations and in the temporary abduction of American citizens. The abductees would be implanted with tracking and control devices, given posthypnotic suggestions, sometimes used as guinea pigs in genetic engineering and cross-breeding programs, and occasionally killed.21 Lear's
text alleged that the "EBEs" (extraterrestrial biological entities) have a
"genetic disorder" that has caused their digestive system to atrophy. They
can survive only by ingesting biological substances obtained from cows or
humans, or by creating an alien-human cross-bred race. This need led to
the construction, under government auspices, of gigantic laboratories, not
only to receive the aliens' technology but also to allow them to conduct
biological experiments. These laboratories included Groom Lake, Nevada
(better known in the ufology literature as Area 51 or Dreamland), and
several in New Mexico, notably near the small town of Dulce. There, Lear
claims, a joint CIA-alien laboratory provides facilities for unspeakable
experiments on abducted subjects. Indeed, the aliens' behavior was so
repugnant that in 1979 a subterranean battle supposedly took place between
them and U.S. military personnel, in which sixty-six U.S. troops were
killed.22 The
battle at Dulce was the beginning of a crisis for MJ-12, which gradually
became aware of the "Grand Deception"—namely, the failure of the aliens to
live up to their agreement. Their technology turned out to be only
partially usable, they were abducting far more Americans than they had
agreed to, and they were mistreating them. Faced with this situation,
MJ-12 supposedly decided it was foolhardy to attempt immediate resistance
and instead opted to develop weapons that might permit effective
resistance at some later time. This weapons development program was the
Strategic Defense Initiative, disguised as a Cold War project.23
The
Lear statement is brief—only seven printed pages—but dizzying in its
claims. It elevates MJ-12 to a conspiratorial position nowhere hinted at
in the original papers themselves. It implies a web of subsidiary
conspiracies—to silence the news media and the academic community, and to
mislead the UFO community as well. According to Lear, ufologist William
Moore, the figure most identified with the MJ-12 papers, was probably
himself a disinformation agent in the hire of MJ-12. The statement ends
with a litany of rhetorical questions—a common device in conspiracy
literature—all implying that the aliens' ultimate aim is the conquest of
the earth, and that the conspirators in government, centered in MJ-12, are
powerless to prevent it.24 Although
Lear did not employ the term New World Order, he managed to bring together
a number of elements compatible with New World Order theory, including
mind-control implants, a government within the government, and the
kidnapping of hundreds of thousands of Americans. Lear's claim of having
been a CIA pilot only added to the sense that this was an insider's view,
notwithstanding the paucity of evidence.25 If
Lear had been alone in his bizarre allegations, they would have
disappeared from view. But they were quickly taken up and amplified by a
figure who was to prove central to the convergence of UFO and militia
positions: Milton William Cooper, the most famous of UFO conspiracists.
Cooper also had a military background, having served in the air force and
later the navy, from which he was discharged in 1975. Between his
discharge and his ufology debut, he apparently received some training and
experience in photography as well as working at administrative jobs in
vocational colleges. Best known in ufology circles for his bitter
conflicts with rivals and critics, his conspiracist reputation rests
primarily on a 1991 book, Behold a Pale Horse. While it may not be, as
Cooper's Web site biography claims, "the best selling underground book of
all time," it is widely available and, apparently, widely read in ufology,
conspiracy, and antigovernment circles.26 The Cooper Narrative Cooper
presented his own MJ-12 account in a series of related documents released
between December 1988 and the end of 1989. Coming as they did immediately
after both the MJ-12 release and the Lear statement, Cooper's claims
caused a sensation in ufology circles. In a series of Internet postings
and in an appearance at the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) symposium in Las
Vegas in July 1989, Cooper claimed to have seen an astonishing array of
secret UFO documents during his naval career. His earliest accounts, from
December 1988 and January 1989, closely parallel the MJ-12 papers and the
Lear statement, yet they mention neither Moore nor Lear. Instead, Cooper
claimed independent knowledge, asserting that in 1972, while in the navy,
he was shown sets of documents and photographs dealing with UFOs, their
extraterrestrial passengers, and relations between the extraterrestrials
and the federal government.27 The
earliest statement of Cooper's views—"Top Secret/Majic"—was, according to
Linda Moulton Howe, posted on the CompuServe and Paranet
networks on December 18, 1988. It purports to summarize the material
Cooper says he saw sixteen years previously. While the substance is
closely related to the MJ-12 and Lear materials, the structure of Cooper's
statement is quite different. It is neither a set of primary documents nor
a narrative. Most of it consists of brief sections, often no more than a
paragraph, each of which describes or defines a name or term Cooper said
he encountered in the original navy material. Many are names of projects
or operations allegedly initiated by the government to deal with
extraterrestrials, giving the entire statement a decidedly bureaucratic
tinge.28 Several
details of Cooper's account are noteworthy, either in the manner in which
they distance themselves from Moore and Lear or by suggesting new
political implications. The latter are particularly important, because in
the 1990s Cooper emerged as the most conspicuous link between UFO
conspiracists and militia circles. The
Cooper variations, while small, increased the congruence between UFO
conspiracies and the tales of plots circulating on the extreme right,
though there is no explicit evidence that Cooper was familiar with
right-wing literature at the time. In his version, the MJ-12 group is a
relatively small part of a much larger government enterprise directed at
understanding the aliens, dealing with them, and keeping knowledge from
reaching the general public. Not surprisingly, the CIA is described as
central to the enterprise, a claim also made in Andrews's 1986 description
of the conspiracy. Black helicopters make an appearance as well, allegedly
accompanying test flights of recovered alien craft over the Nevada desert.
Although Andrews had not mentioned black helicopters specifically, he did
report transformations in which saucers turned into helicopters and vice
versa.29 Cooper did not mention the Trilateral Commission, but he introduced motifs that were to make its future inclusion appear natural. He referred to teams called Delta that, he claimed, provide security for all projects related to the aliens and whose members in fact are the legendary men in black. Later on, others more explicitly identified this group with the well-known Delta Force counter-terrorism organization. Cooper's references to Delta are closely related to his lengthy discussion of what he called "a trilateral insignia" allegedly found on alien spacecraft. He claimed that the Delta security guards wear red badges with a black triangle, similar to the "alien flag" of a triangle divided by parallel lines. His linking of the terms delta, trilateral, and men in black offered the possibility of conspiracy in which U.S. military forces, aliens, and the Trilateral Commission collude.30 Like
Lear, Cooper alleged that the aliens came to Earth not out of mere
curiosity but because some biological flaw made them dependent on
substances, including blood, that could be obtained from human and animal
bodies. According to Cooper, they might have evolved from plants, because
they use chlorophyll to convert food into energy and excrete waste
products through the skin. How this mechanism related to the need for
human and animal blood was not explained.31 In
early 1989, Cooper issued a revised version of this document. It has since
been frequently posted on the Internet. Not all versions, however, are
identical. As is often the case with Internet documents, there is no way
to determine definitively if changes have been made since the date the
document bears.32 Notwithstanding
these difficulties, the later Cooper document is interesting in its own
right. In the first place, Cooper attributed the differences between this
and the earlier version to his having undergone "hypnotic regression in
order to make the information as accurate as possible." He did not
indicate who performed the hypnosis, when, or under what conditions. The
second version also contains a much-elaborated description of the MJ-12
group itself. It allegedly consists of the twelve senior members of a
thirty-two-member secret society called the Jason Society, which was
"commissioned" by President Eisenhower to "find the truth of the alien
question."33 Identifying
a complete and accurate text of the second Cooper document is difficult.
Howe's published version contains elisions. An Internet version is
considerably longer and places material in a somewhat different order. It
is also more overtly political, with references to the Kennedy
assassination, the Rockefeller family, black helicopters, and the
trilateral insignia; and it charges that the activities described violate
the Constitution, as well as "the human rights of every citizen of the
world." This longer text may well have been written as early as the
printed one (i.e., January 10, 1989), but the technology of the Internet
makes the date impossible to verify.34 Cooper's
claims in the second document regarding abductee implants and
concentration camps were equally sweeping. One in every forty Americans
has allegedly been implanted, which would amount to several million
individuals. The concentration camps are part of a plan in which, under
the pretext of a terrorist nuclear threat, martial law would be declared
and the media nationalized.35 Cooper's
next text, dated May 23, 1989, was an Internet document made public at a
UFO symposium in Las Vegas on July 2 of that year. It subsequently formed
part of a chapter in Behold a Pale Horse. Here, too, the political
element was conspicuously present: the CIA was created to deal with the
alien threat, Secretary of Defense Forrestal was an abductee, and the
presidents were kept in ignorance.36 Up
to this point, Cooper had suggested little in the way of political action
beyond recommending that Congress be informed. Sometime in 1989, however,
he associated himself with an anonymous document labeled "Petition to
Indict." In his undated accompanying letter, Cooper spoke of "Many other
signatures . . . on the original copy," presumably in addition to his own.
He begged Congress to act on the petition, but "not to trust any other
government agency with these matters because this conspiracy runs deep
within the government."37 The
"Petition to Indict," which runs somewhat more than four typed pages,
appears in some places to be addressed simply to "the government," at
others more specifically to Congress. It charges that "the government"
entered into "a secret treaty with an Alien Nation" in violation of the
Constitution. In addition to repeating many of the points already made by
Lear and Cooper, it charges that the resources to fund secret,
alien-related projects came from CIA involvement in the international drug
trade.38 The
petition is also significant for its lengthy references to the involvement
of then-president George H.W. Bush. Calling Bush "the most powerful and
dangerous criminal in the history of the world," the petition charges that
Bush's involvement in the international drug trade went back to his days
in the oil business and continued throughout his tenure as CIA director.
Bush's associations with Skull and Bones and the Trilateral Commission
have made him a favorite target of conspiracy theorists.39
Because
the petition asks full disclosure of government plots by May 30, 1989, it
can reasonably be dated to early that year, that is to say, roughly
contemporaneous with the revised version of the Cooper document. The
petition is vague about what might happen if no government action is taken
on its charges. But it warns that failure to act will make every member of
the House and Senate "accessories to the conspiracy and the crimes
outlined in this document," and the signatories "swear on the
Constitution" to bring "all guilty parties . . . to justice." How they
might do this is not specified.40 The
"Petition to Indict" bears some similarities to the "Constructive Notices"
sent in 1986 to a judge and to Internal Revenue Service personnel in
Nevada. The "Constructive Notices" were purported indictments issued by
the Committee of the States, an entity created by Christian Identity
preacher and tax protestor William Potter Gale. The "Constructive Notices"
threatened the lives of the recipients, and in October 1987, Gale and his
associates were tried and convicted of interfering in the administration
of the tax laws. In retrospect, it can be seen that the Committee of the
States affair anticipated such developments as so-called common-law courts
among antigovernment groups in the 1990s. There is no direct evidence that
Cooper or the anonymous drafter or drafters of the "Petition to Indict"
were familiar with Gale's activities. Nonetheless, like the Committee of
the States and many subsequent examples of right-wing shadow legal
institutions, the petition implies the authority to bring malefactors to
justice if formal legal institutions do not.41 By
the late 1990s, Cooper had moved away from the ufology community, where he
had first appeared a decade earlier, to the subculture of militias and
other antigovernment groups. His Web site circulated conspiracist versions
of the Oklahoma City bombing, and he spoke in the name of a shadowy
organization called the Second Continental Army of the Republic (Militia),
about which little is known. As Gale had, Cooper also took on the Internal
Revenue Service.42 Cooper
became convinced that he had been targeted by "The Illuminati Socialist
President of the United States of America, William Jefferson Clinton" as
well as "by the bogus and unconstitutional Internal Revenue Service." His
conflict with the latter resulted in an arrest warrant issued in July
1998. As of fall 2000, it still had not been executed, which resulted in
Cooper's being named a "major fugitive" by the U.S. Marshals Service. The
government's reluctance to arrest Cooper was apparently a reflection of
his conflict-laden rhetoric: "We are formed as the Constitutional and
Lawful unorganized Militia of the State of Arizona and the united [sic]
States of America. . . . By invading the Sovereign jurisdiction of the
State of Arizona to attack the Citizens of the State of Arizona the United
States has declared war upon the Citizens of the Several States of the
Union. . . . We have drawn our line in the sand." The warrant was never
served, because Cooper was shot and killed by sheriff's deputies in
November 2001 as a result of an incident unrelated to his tax problems.
This bizarre conclusion to a strange life is described more fully in
chapter 10.43 Cooper
was not the only figure in the UFO subculture who was elaborating
politically charged conspiracy theories by the end of the 1980s. The year
1989 marked the beginning of the activities of John Grace, also known as
Val Germann and Val (or Valdamar) Valerian. Grace was an air force
enlisted man stationed at Nellis Air Force Base near Las Vegas, where he
apparently came into contact with Lear. About 1988, Grace-Valerian founded
the Nevada Aerial Research Group in Las Vegas, but soon relocated it to
Yelm, Washington, under the name Leading Edge Research Group. He has been
an extraordinarily prolific writer and publisher, claiming to have issued
tens of thousands of pages. His central works are the massive, ongoing
series of Matrix volumes, of which at least six have appeared, and the
serial publication The Leading Edge.44 It
is impossible to summarize Valerian's system. Indeed, it may well be one
of the most complex superconspiracy theories ever constructed. Scarcely
any major organization or institution escapes inclusion. One diagrammatic
representation requires six pages to lay out the connections among
elements of the plot, including the Gestapo, the Mafia, and the Wobblies
(IWW). Valerian ranges not only across the usual UFO and conspiracist
terrain but across politics, religion, science, and history. He clearly
regards his system not merely as an explanation of flying saucers or
contemporary politics but as a synoptic vision of all knowledge.45
Cooper
edged gradually toward more ambitious conspiratorial schemes, but even at
his most sweeping he never sought to cover areas such as the sciences
(about which, in fact, he claimed ignorance). Valerian, by contrast, takes
conspiracism to its logical conclusion by suggesting that all true
knowledge has been deliberately hidden, and that attempts to reveal it in
one area will inevitably reveal the entire structure, if only one digs
widely and deeply enough. Anything that is available and obvious is false,
while what is hidden has to be true; its hiddenness can have occurred only
because those who truly know do not wish it to be revealed. As Valerian
puts it, "As a result of the suppression and compartmentalization of
information, cultures have been fragmented into several distinct groups
and mind sets which both co-exist and oppose each other." He clearly
believes that he has discovered the suppressed synthesis.46
Leading
Edge's location, Yelm, Washington, is also the home of J.Z. Knight, a
channeler who claims to be the medium transmitting the words of a
35,000-year-old warrior named Ramtha. The Ramtha School of Enlightenment
in Yelm was founded in 1988 or 1989, about the time Valerian arrived.
There appear to be no direct links between Valerian's organization and
Knight's, but they do share common themes. Ramtha asserts that the UFOs
carry aliens who are "your higher brothers." Valerian, like Knight,
employs the entity terminology standard in channeling circles, and he
includes favorable material about Ramtha in the Matrix volumes. There are
some differences: for instance, like many conspiracy-minded ufologists,
Valerian believes that there are many alien races, some of which are
malevolent. For their part, Knight and Ramtha identify evil with a
conspiracy of international bankers who include the Rothschilds and the
Federal Reserve. The Ramtha School's book service sells works by Cooper,
David Icke, and Jim Keith, and the Ramtha newsletter has published lengthy
interviews with Mark Phillips and Cathy O'Brien, with their tales of CIA
mind-controlled sex slaves. Notwithstanding the lack of formal
connections, Valerian and Knight clearly seem to tap into the same cultic
milieu.47 By
the early 1990s, therefore, at least some of the ufology literature had
gone through several transformations. It had become intensely politicized.
It insisted that powerful elements in the U.S. government were in
continuing collaboration with an evil, alien race. And it claimed that in
order to protect this information, the secret government was prepared to
destroy American liberties. From 1986 to about 1990, the activities of
Andrews, Lear, Cooper, and Valerian created a conspiracist form of UFO
speculation, which Jerome Clark refers to as ufology's "dark side."48
Much
of this material was either strikingly similar to or compatible with the
conspiracy ideas simultaneously circulating in the militia and militant
antigovernment subculture. The mythology of concentration camps, secret
government security forces, wholesale violation of the Constitution, and
control of the state by a hidden elite are themes prominent in both
domains. Yet any link between them in the 1980s appears circumstantial.
The UFO conspiracists were especially active in the West, where the
extreme right was particularly evident; even so, no evidence exists at
this time of direct contact between them. UFO Conspiracy
Theories 1.
Andrew Macdonald (pseudonym of William L. Pierce), The Turner Diaries, 2d
ed. (Washington, D.C.: National Alliance, 1980). Typical of the news
coverage is Mark Potok and Katy Kelly, "Militia Movement's Draw: A Shared
Anger, Fear," USA Today, May 16, 1995 2.
Pat Robertson, The New World Order (Dallas: Word, 1991). "Buchanan
Promises 'Millennial Struggle' against World Government," CNN, January 6,
2000; http://www.cnn.com/ (January 7,
2000). 3.
Phil Patton, "Indeed They Have Landed. Look Around," The New York Times,
June 15, 1997, section H, 38. Jodi Dean, Aliens in America: Conspiracy
Cultures from Outerspace to Cyberspace (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University
Press, 1998), p. 36. Amy Harmon, "For U.F.O. Buffs, 50 Years of Hazy
History," The New York Times, June 14, 1997, section A, 1. "Gallup UFO
Poll: Some Want to Believe, Some Don't," http://www.parascope.com/articles/0597/gallup.htm(July
2, 1997). 4.
Cynthia Fox, "The Search for Extraterrestrial Life," Life (March 2000)
5.
Dean, Aliens in America 6.
Brenda Denzler, The Lure of the Edge: Scientific Passions, Religious
Beliefs, and the Pursuit of UFOs (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 2001) 7.
"Gallup UFO Poll." Fox, "The Search for Extraterrestrial Life".
8.
"Men in Black," in The UFO Encyclopedia, ed. John Spencer (New York: Avon,
1993). Jerome Clark, The UFO Files (Lincolnwood, Ill.: Publications
International, 1996). Peter Rojcewicz, "The 'Men in Black' Experience and
Tradition: Analogues with the Traditional Devil Hypothesis," Journal of
American Folklore 100 (April—June 1987). The first book on the subject,
which initially appeared in 1956, was by Gray Barker: They Knew Too Much
about Flying Saucers, repr. (Lilburn, Ga.: IllumiNet, 1997).
9.
The literature on each is very large; but the nature of the material can
be gleaned from the following. On Area 51: David Darlington, Area 51: The
Dreamland Chronicles (New York: Henry Holt, 1997); and Phil Patton,
Travels in Dreamland: The Secret History of Area 51 (London: Millennium,
1997). On Dulce: Branton, The Dulce Wars: Underground Alien Bases &
the Battle for Planet Earth (New Brunswick, N.J.: Inner Light/Global
Communications, 1999); and Commander X, Underground Alien Bases (n.p.:
Abelard Productions, 1990). 10.
"Abduction Phenomenon," in The UFO Encyclopedia, ed. Jerome Clark, vol. 1
(Detroit: Apogee, 1990). Thomas E. Bullard, UFO Abductions: The Measure of
a Mystery (n.p.: Fund for UFO Research, 1987), vol. 1.
11.
"Hollow Earth and UFOs," in The UFO Encyclopedia, ed. Jerome Clark, vol. 2
(Detroit: Omnigraphics, 1992). Commander X, "Legions of Doom," UFO
Universe, Conspiracies & Cover-ups, Special Issue 1 (1998). The
Nazi-UFO stories have been most fully reconstructed by Nicholas
Goodrick-Clarke in Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the
Politics of Identity (New York: New York University Press, 2002), chap. 8.
12.
"Animal Mutilations and UFOs," in The UFO Encyclopedia, ed. Jerome Clark,
vol. 3 (Detroit: Omnigraphics, 1996). George E. Onet, "Animal Mutilations:
What We Know," National Institute for Discovery Science,
http://www.nidsci.org/articles/animal1.html (September 13, 2000). Idem,
"Animal Mutilations: What We Don't Know," National Institute for Discovery
Science, http://www.nidsci.org/articles/animal2.html(September
13, 2000). 13.
"Animal Mutilations and UFOs" 14.
"Linda Moulton Howe: The 'Alien Harvest' and Beyond," transcript of a
conversation in UFOs and the Alien Presence: Six Viewpoints, ed. Michael
Lindemann (Newberg, Ore.: Wild Flower, 1991). Linda Moulton Howe, An Alien
Harvest: Further Evidence Linking Animal Mutilations and Human Abductions
to Alien Life Forms (Huntingdon Valley, Penn.: Linda Moulton Howe
Productions, 1989). On Howe, see Idaho Statesman (Boise), June 5, 1998,
1d. Bullard, UFO Abductions. 15.
Alternative 3 (videotape; Beverly Hills, Calif.: Underground Video, 1996);
originally broadcast on Science Report, Anglia Television (U.K.), April 1,
1977. 16. Alternative 3. Leslie Watkins, Alternative 3 (London: Sphere, 1978). Jim Keith, Casebook on Alternative 3: UFOs, Secret Societies and World Control (Lilburn, Ga.: IllumiNet, 1994). Idem, Mind Control and UFOs: Casebook on Alternative 3 (Lilburn, Ga.: IllumiNet, 1999). Bob Rickard, "Hoax: Alternative," Fortean Times 64 (August—September 1992) 17.
George C. Andrews, Extra-Terrestrials among Us, repr. (St. Paul, Minn.:
Llewellyn, 1993 [orig. 1986]). William R. Pabst, "Concentration Camp Plans
for U.S. Citizens," see, e.g., http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/2012/camps.txt(January
25, 1999). 18.
Patton, Travels in Dreamland. Stanton T. Friedman, Top Secret/Majic (New
York: Marlowe, 1997). Howe, An Alien Harvest. The texts appear in Timothy
Good, Above Top Secret: The Worldwide U.F.O. Cover-up (New York: William
Morrow, 1988). The MJ-12 documents also appear in Friedman, Top
Secret/Majic, and Howe, An Alien Harvest. Robert Alan Goldberg provides
another description of the affair in Enemies Within: The Culture of
Conspiracy in Modern America (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press,
2001). 19.
Jacques Vallee, Revelations: Alien Contact and Human Deception (New York:
Ballantine, 1991). "Skeptics Attack," http://www.parascope.com/ds/0996/maj2.htm(July
1, 1997). 20.
For example, "Declassified Documents Confirm Recovery of Alien Craft and
Bodies!" Nexus 6 (February—March 1999) 21.
"Statement Released By: John Lear, December 29, 1987," William F. Hamilton
III, Alien Magic (Glendale, Calif.: Uforces, 1989). 22.
Ibid. 23.
Ibid. 24.
Ibid. 25.
A brief biographical statement precedes the text of Lear's statement.
26.
Donna Kossy, Kooks (Portland, Ore.: Feral House, 1994), pp. 191—192.
"William Cooper: A Short Biography," http://williamcooper.com/william.htm(August
29, 2000). Milton William Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse (Sedona, Ariz.:
Light Technology, 1991). 27.
Don Ecker, "Dead Man Talking," Fortean Times 155 (March 2002): 38.
28.
The December 18 statement is reproduced in Howe, An Alien Harvest
29.
Howe, An Alien Harvest. Andrews, Extra-Terrestrials among Us
30.
Howe, An Alien Harvest, pp. 185, 190—191. Milton William Cooper, "The
Cooper Document: The Absolute True Information Regarding the Alien
Presence on Earth" (1989), posted October 29, 1997, http://server.wizards.net/mac/handy/incoming/cooperdoc.html(November
6, 1997)
32. There are some discrepancies in dates for Cooper material between Hamilton, Alien Magic, and Howe, An Alien Harvest 33.
Howe, An Alien Harvest 34.
Cooper, "The Cooper Document." 35.
Howe, An Alien Harvest 36.
Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse 37.
Letter from Milton William Cooper, published in Hamilton, Alien Magic,
unpaginated section. 38.
"Petition to Indict," published in Hamilton, Alien Magic, unpaginated
section. 39.
Ibid. 40.
Ibid. 41.
For a detailed, though partisan, treatment of Gale, see Cheri Seymour,
Committee of the States: Inside the Radical Right (Mariposa, Calif.:
Camden Place Communications, 1991). Michael Barkun, Religion and the
Racist Right: The Origins of the Christian Identity Movement, rev. ed.
(Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997)
42.
Milton William Cooper, "The Plot Thickens," http://harvest-trust.org/plot.htm(June
30, 1998). Idem, "In Search of . . . Mail Digest, May 11, 1997," http://in-search-of.com/frames/WWWBoard/messages/1050.html(November
11, 1997). 43.
For Cooper's quotation, see "Cooper Family Targeted by Feds,"
http://www.williamcooper.com/targeted.htm (August 29, 2000). "USMS Major
Fugitive Cases," http://www.usdoj.gov/marshals/wanted/major-cases/cases.html#A
(August 30, 2000). 44.
"Unofficial Link Page for John Grace," http://www.ufomind.com/people/g/grace/
(September 16, 1998). "Animal Mutilations and UFOs," p. 34. Valdamar
Valerian, Matrix II: The Abduction and Manipulation of Humans Using
Advanced Technology, 3d ed. (Yelm, Wash.: Leading Edge Research Group,
1990—1991). Idem, Matrix III: The Psycho-Social, Chemical, Biological and
Electromagnetic Manipulation of Human Consciousness (Yelm, Wash.: Leading
Edge Research Group, 1992). 45.
Valerian, Matrix III, vol. 1 46.
Valerian, Matrix II, p. v. 47.
J. Gordon Melton, Finding Enlightenment: Ramtha, School of Ancient
Wisdom (Hillsboro, Ore.: Beyond Words, 1998), pp. 70—71. Idem, "Ramtha's
School of Enlightenment," in The Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New
Religions, ed. James R. Lewis, 2d ed. (Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus, 2002),
pp. 596—600. 48. "Animal Mutilations and UFOs" |