Is there a common denominator among the "maximum systems" such as the
teachings of Ramana Maharshi (likened to the Advaita Vedanta of
Shankara), the Albigen System of Richard Rose, Taoism and Zen? I believe
there is, and it is that they are non-system systems and non-teaching
teachings. They offer no formulas for the seeker but describe a way of
"holding one's head" and of making one's life a living laboratory.
These systems aimed at maximum realization are based on a self-realized
individual pointing the way, and "the way" has to be read between the
written lines and heard between the spoken words. As the American Zen
master Alfred Pulyan wrote, if the truth could be put into words, then
it would be published in the newspapers. These teachings are
well-represented by the four pillars of Zen attributed to Bodhidharma
circa 600 AD (see left column).
Words, according to Ramana Maharshi, act as a resistance to the flow of
truth, as a light fixture in an electrical circuit acts as a resistor.
The glowing light may alert us to the presence of its mysterious source,
but it takes an actual contact with the current to shock us into true
awareness. And awareness of It, these teachers tell us, reveals our true
nature and being.
The originators of these maximum systems testified to awakening to their
true nature and having found it to be an absolute state of being. The
transition into this awareness and a communication of it have nowhere
been transmitted with as much beauty and force as in "The Three Books of
the Absolute," which came to Richard Rose in one sitting shortly after
his awakening in 1947.
Another common thread running through these non-system systems is the
paradoxical nature of the truth when we try to grasp it with the mind.
Our body-minds are immersed in a dualistic
dimension where everything is ultimately defined in terms of what it
isn't, and where the opposite of any philosophical assertion can be seen
to be equally as valid. This condition was well-expressed by Abu Yazid,
a Persian Sufi, who said: "This thing we tell of can never
be found by seeking, but only seekers find it."
The Threefold Path
Rose studied in a Catholic pre-seminary in his teens and became highly
disappointed with his inherited religion. But after his self-realization
at age thirty, he was able to find esoteric wisdom in the Bible. An
example of this was the statement attributed to Jesus: "I am the way,
the truth and the life." Rose realized that this simple sentence
described a broad approach to the spiritual search that could also be
used as a self-checking device, and that it had been expressed similarly
in the threefold aspect of Buddhism, namely taking refuge in the
Buddha, the Dharma and the Sangha.
The directive of the threefold path is to be aware of the three aspects
simultaneously: establishing a practice other than just reading or
writing or talking about the search (the Way, Dharma); recognizing that
chances of accomplishment are much greater if one finds one's
fellow-seekers to work with (the Life, Sangha); and living an increasing
truthful life (the Truth; Buddha). Rose circulated a three-page paper
among his students that spelled out his recommendations on the threefold
path in some detail.
Energy Transmutation, Between-ness & Transmission
This is the title of one of Richard Rose's books, and it contains
information that I've never found elsewhere. He wrote that an
intentional search for truth, or self-definition, requires the creation
of a large quantum of neural energy, which comes about by conserving
glandular energy and transmuting it through mental effort. His advice is
very practical and at the same time subtle, because his directive is
one of "becoming" rather than learning. The finite mind may never grasp
the infinite, but there is a way for the finite mind to become less
finite. Such becoming relies on an adroitness that cannot be taught but
is hinted at in his poem, "I come to you as a man selling air...."
Reversing the Vector
If we're searching for truth about the self and its relation to the
cosmos, if we're seeking to lead a life that finds for us an explanation
for our life, it's not the same as plotting a course to London or even
Tanganyika. We don't know what the truth is or where to find it, and
when we realize that it's not something that can be put into books or
(worse yet) grasped by the mind, we have to find a more dexterous
approach. The one that appeals to philosophical common sense is that of
backing away from untruth. We sharpen the sword of discernment by
retreating from the less true in favor of the more true. We make
ourselves into a very determined vector – force in a given direction –
and reverse the vector from its natural direction of focus on the
external world. We observe everything in our range of vision, realizing
that the self is never that which is seen. As we become less
identified with what we once thought of as ourselves (our body, our
feelings, our thoughts, etc.) the line between outside and inside
shifts. Rose calls this process "climbing Jacob's Ladder," which he
describes in The Psychology of the Observer. This is the basic process that everyone goes through who comes to a realization of his true essence, he wrote.
I'd like to leave you with a few quotes from various sources that I
think illustrate the common theme running through the maximum systems.
On Surrender to a Higher Power
Fortunately, even though life may get rough, "all will be well, very well." I cannot logically prove this, but it is a fact
(if you will let your friend make a mere assertion of what is true by
his own experience) and it is a fact according to a lot of others too,
that there is a Something that seeks us individually & personally with a humility & open simplicity we often lack. The poem "The Hound of Heaven" by Francis Thompson illustrates this.... (Alfred Pulyan, American Zen master, from unpublished correspondence)
Do things for the sake of a higher power, and it will correctly guide
your every step. There is a god within every man... that finds his
contact with the Chief Engineer of this scenario... the Absolute God
that has everything planned or is able to at least enable us to see that
everything is for the best. And the best includes eternal contentment
at the cost of momentary inconvenience. (Richard Rose, unpublished correspondence, courtesy of an appreciative friend)
More on Between-ness
Suppose truth is a rabbit. This rabbit is in a field – a large field.
Round the field are very high walls – creeds & dogma! So – find your
damn rabbit!! And remember the rabbit knows your thoughts & so as
you resolve to go one way to catch it, it knows & evades you! (Alfred Pulyan, correspondence)
In the light of consciousness all sorts of things happen and one need
not give special importance to any. The sight of a flower is as
marvelous as the vision of God. Let them be. Why remember them and then
make memory into a problem? Be bland about them; do not divide them into
high and low, inner and outer, lasting and transient. Go beyond, go
back to the source, go to the self that is the same whatever happens.
Your weakness is due to your
conviction that you were born into the world. In reality the world is
ever recreated in you and by you. See everything as emanating from the
light which is the source of your own being. (Nisargadatta, dialogue 43.)
Consciousness, descending from above the field of subject-object
knowledge, is distorted just as soon as it is forced into the relative
form of expression. In the latter field, discursive formulation has
finished its task when it has finally shown what non-relative Knowledge
is not. It clears the ground so that no obstruction remains for entering
the Darkness and Silence. But when the 'Voice of Silence' speaks into
the relative world, the meaning lies between the words, as it were,
rather than in the direct content of the words themselves.... We may say
that the sequence of words is like the obverse side of an embroidered
design. One must turn to the other side of the cloth to see the real
figure.... (Franklin Merrell-Wolff, from Experience and Philosophy)
Whenever a question is put to you, answer it in the negative if it is an affirmative one, and vice versa. (Hui-neng's deathbed instructions to his disciples, from The Sutra of Hui-neng)
What Should I Do?
Part of the system I advise in The Albigen Papers is that we make milk from thorns.
These very things which are negatives can be turned, the energy taken
from them, and this energy can be used in progression – in finding goals
faster. (Richard Rose, Boston College Lecture, in The Direct-Mind Experience)
Be like the Tao.
It can't be approached or withdrawn from,
benefited or harmed,
honored or brought into disgrace.
It gives itself up continuously.
That is why it endures.
(From the Tao te Ching, verse 56)
The solution to your problem is to see who has it.
(Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi)
In the pursuit of knowledge,
every day something is added.
In the practice of the Tao,
every day something is dropped.
(From the Tao te Ching, verse 48)
God cares absolutely nothing for your imperfections or your perfection. (Shawn Nevins, correspondence)
Strict practices may encourage the creation of more ideas about what the
awakened state looks like as the mind attempts to figure out or
approximate it. But how can the mind approximate what it cannot grasp?
The vastness is unimaginable. Although it is always
present, the mind cannot recognize it because the infinite is not
perceived through the mind. The infinite perceives itself. (Suzanne Segal, Collision with the Infinite)
All thinking is an effort to avoid facing what is. (J. Krishnamurti, First & Last Freedom)
Questioner: All my life I was striving and achieved so little. I was reading, I was listening – all in vain.
Maharaj: Listening and reading became a habit with you.
Q: I gave it up too. I do not read nowadays.
M: What you gave up is of no importance now. What have you not given
up? Find that out and give that up. Sadhana [spiritual practice] is a
search for what to give up. Empty yourself completely....
Q: I am tired of all the ways and means and skills and tricks, of all
these mental acrobatics. Is there a way to perceive reality directly
and immediately?
M: Stop making use of your mind and see what happens. Do this one thing thoroughly. That is all.
(Nisargadatta, dialogue 43.)
The Individual
Essence
The Self is here and now, alone. (Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi)
I used to be fascinated as a child by the behavior of a glob of mercury –
splitting into tiny droplets and then watching those separate pieces
"rush into each other" when in close proximity. The essence of
individuals is like so many scattered bits of mercury that are drawn to
each other as a manifestation in this dimension of the "desire to be
re-absorbed" into the One-ness from which they've all split. We cannot
get close enough to each other. And a lifetime of accidental patterns
"conspires" to block our "re-joining".... The proximity of death is like
an enzyme that thins the boundaries. In this condition individuals rush
together to embrace each other, to embrace that which unites us all. (Bob Cergol, correspondence)
Huang Po was right on
And John Davis, too.
Richard Rose became the All,
Merrell-Wolff left many a clue.
Harding sees through his head and to the other side.
Bernadette turns within and naught does she find.
Maharshi speaks, but would much rather not,
Silence is closer than talk.
All have been to the place you have not,
Where you leave your self behind.
Get there by hunger, get there by pain,
Strive your whole life through.
Look at the looker, then he might crack,
To reveal the God that is True.
(Shawn Nevins, unpublished. Re. John Davis: see his fascinating life story in Vol. 14 of the TAT Journal; re.
Franklin Merrell-Wolff, Douglas Harding and Bernadette Roberts: see the Spiritual Search website on the Links page)
To meditate means to realize inwardly the imperturbability of the Essence of Mind. (The Sutra of Hui-neng)
The person who's always trying to go within and have this experience is the experience that the impersonal Awareness is having. (Bob Cergol, correspondence)
Quoting
The chief feature of the Quoter is his manifest cowardice and inability to outline
in his own words that which he believes. (Ouch! Richard Rose, The Albigen Papers)